EWA SONNET USED AS PURPOSEFUL CLICKBAIT 🥛 TO EXPOSE THE BAIT AND SWITCH OF MILK PASTEURIZATION

⁣Recall what was said in the last video posted❓

Not saying a bloody thing more about it 🤐

VfB HAS DISCOVERED THE COLOSSAL BAIT AND SWITCH PULLED UPON ALL THE FARMERS OF THE WORLD 🥛 Pasteurization was simply a means to weaken us from within

Have you ever heard of LACTOFERRIN❓

Bet you haven't

Any doctors ever inquire about your levels of lactoferrin❓

Ask your doctor this morning if, without looking it up, they know what this is

Lactoferrin is the compound that makes your bones strong [among other things, but not having personal knowledge...- VfB]; but pasteurization DESTROYS LACTOFERRIN, WHILE DENATURING THE LIQUID ☠

https://api.parliament.uk/hist....oric-hansard/lords/1

https://history.stackexchange.....com/questions/74155/

It’s known that in 50+ years of Lordship, Lord Rothschild only addressed the house twice:

Once was about the establishment of a Jewish homeland
The other was about instituting compulsory pasteurisation of dairy
Why was he sufficiently interested in pasteurisation to ask questions about it?

It will not be necessary for me to say much about the benefits of pasteurized milk or, as it is known in these days, heat treated milk. Your Lordships are aware that a large number of people die each year through drinking milk contaminated with the bovine tuberculosis germ. I will not weary your Lordships with statistics, but will merely mention that if all the members of this House were killed twice a year—and I think your Lordships will agree that this would be a matter of some gravity—the number of deaths would be of the same order as that caused in the United Kingdom by drinking raw milk contaminated with the germ of tuberculosis. I need not remind your Lordships that the number of casualties from this germ far exceeds the number of deaths; but no precise figures are available to me on this point, though the number of casualties has been estimated at about five times the number of deaths. If we put the number of deaths per year at 1,600, the number of casualties will be between 7,000 and 8,000. These casualties, which require months of hospital treatment, are a source of misery and anxiety to their families and grave expense to the State.

§Of course tuberculosis is not the only disease caused by drinking raw milk contaminated with germs. Undulant fever claims an unknown number of victims each year—un-known because it is a difficult disease to diagnose—while outbreaks of typhoid and paratyphoid fever, dysentry, food poisoning, scarlet fever, and diphtheria 645are known to be caused from time to time by the drinking of raw milk. During the war, well authenticated milk-borne examples of each of these diseases were reported in the medical Press. Possibly the noble Lord who replies for the Government may be able to tell your Lordships if there have been any outbreaks of disease caused by drinking contaminated raw milk in the United Kingdom during 1946.

§It would appear obvious from the few words I have said that considerable benefits would accrue to the population of this country by removing a perfectly clear cut source of disease and death from the population's milk; and on the assumption that this side of the case is not in dispute, I will turn to the other side which concerns the arguments put forward by the opponents of pasteurization. May I say at the start that I neither can nor shall attempt to deal with the economic aspects of this matter? Your Lordships are well aware that one of the criticisms of any scheme involving the compulsory pasteurization of milk in the United Kingdom is that it will have an adverse effect on the small producer-retailers. Your Lordships may have something to say about the relative merits of killing off numbers of the population each year and maintaining the economic interests of a relatively small section of the community, though the words "as far as is practicable" in my Motion indicate that I appreciate the difficulties of extending any scheme of heat treatment to special or rural parts of the country. If I may, I shall return to the question of the producer-retailer later.

§The first objection with which I shall deal is that pasteurized milk tastes nasty, metallic, or at any rate different from raw milk. When I say to your Lordships that this is untrue, you will treat my statement with the same scepticism as the original statement that pasteurized milk tastes nasty. Your Lordships will require scientific or legal evidence one way or another. Such evidence could be obtained by submitting samples of raw and heat treated milk to some cross section of the community and seeing whether the members of this cross section could distinguish between the two types of milk more often than someone guessing or drawing the answer blindfold out of a hat.

AltCastTV & Odysee thumbnail: https://images.app.goo.gl/8F8xPJ4jucrWzLnx6

LESS THAN ZERO CLUE AS TO HOW THIS IS HERE ⁣⁣☺

⁣https://ftjmediacomcdnstorage.....cdn.ypt.me/v_2410111