⁣These people are trying to steal a big Screen Television. This Walmart employee sees they have a fake receipt!

Source: https://x.com/its_The_Dr/statu....s/206738364509505541

⁣The father of a Pakistani gang rapist does not see what his son has done as rape

He blames the 13 year old victim

This is how these people think

RAPE GANG INQUIRY REPORT: https://static1.squarespace.co....m/static/6810978a41b

Source: https://x.com/BasilTheGreat/st....atus/206711798972429

Thumbnail: https://imgflip.com/i/aumlpl [thanks to https://x.com/SnowflakeSlayr1/....status/2067171079450 🖲]

⁣A rare white vs. black one on one.

He ordered the FAFO combo: fries, an elbow, and a side of nap time.

White men can’t jump? But he can sure drop.

Source: https://x.com/AmericaPapaBear/....status/2067410699605

⁣Defamation is the legal term for any false and unprivileged statement communicated to others that damages a person's or business's reputation. It is a civil wrong (tort) designed to hold individuals or organizations accountable for spreading lies that cause quantifiable harm, such as financial loss or emotional distress.

The Two Types of Defamation

Depending on how the false statement is made, defamation is categorized into two main forms:

Libel: Defamation in a published, written, or relatively permanent format (e.g., newspaper articles, websites, social media posts, or videos).

Slander: Defamation communicated via spoken words or fleeting actions (e.g., verbal conversations, speeches, or rumors).

Core Elements of a Defamation Claim

To successfully sue for defamation, the person or business making the claim must generally prove the following:

False Statement of Fact: The statement must be provably false, not merely an unflattering opinion. Pure opinions, satire, or hyperbole are legally protected under free speech.

Publication: The false statement must be communicated to at least one third party (someone other than the person making the statement and the person it is about).

Fault/Negligence: The person who made the statement must have been at least negligent in failing to verify the truth before sharing it. If the victim is a "public figure," they must prove actual malice (meaning the speaker knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth).

Reputational or Financial Harm: The statement must have directly caused actual damage to the victim's character, career, or business. In cases of defamation per se—such as false accusations of committing a serious crime or having a loathsome disease—the harm is legally presumed.

Key Defenses

The most powerful and absolute defense to a defamation lawsuit is truth. No matter how harmful a statement is to someone's reputation, if it is factually accurate, it is not legally actionable. Other common defenses include proving the communication was protected by "privilege" (e.g., statements made by a witness during court testimony) or establishing that the statement was a protected opinion.

For a detailed look at how specific jurisdictions handle these claims, check out the ⁠Legal Information Institute's Defamation Overview or the ⁠Super Lawyers Defamation Law Guide.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/defamation
https://www.superlawyers.com/resources/defamation/

So when Bathhouse Barry says more than once, "my husband Michael" in public arenas, he has LESS THAN ZERO GROUNDS for a defamation lawsuit

Bet Larry Sinclair would have something interesting to say about this...were he still alive

Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BEwuYoZze/

Thumbnail: https://imgflip.com/i/38tqkj

⁣Rabbi's Planet of the Apes Analogy Draws Backlash in Antisemitism Discussion
Last updated
1 hour ago
On Fox News' Outnumbered, Rabbi Mentz discussed a Cornell student's blatant rejection of a job interview, saying 'Not interested in working for a jew,' which the university flagged as antisemitism. He used the movie analogy to capture the shock of overt bigotry, but clips spread widely online where critics accused him of comparing non-Jews to apes. Defenders see it as symbolizing vulnerability to prejudice, highlighting deep divides in how people view antisemitism claims on campuses.

https://x.com/i/trending/2067172316652716399

Fox News brought on a Rabbi today.

He compared gentiles to “apes” and Jews to “humans”.

How is this allowed to air in a Christian nation?

Source: https://x.com/EthanLevins2/sta....tus/2066976270190084

Thumbnail: https://imgflip.com/i/aujc1q

This screed is the result of Austin Franco declining to work at Gabe Einhorn’s real estate startup, VrfyID; when he did, he was doxxed and the incident reported as a bias crime:

https://www.cornellsun.com/art....icle/2026/06/student

Well, this ought to cheese you freaks off:

"Thank you for all the support and job offers!"

https://www.givesendgo.com/fun....d-austin-franco-afte

Planet of the Apes, my ass 🦍

PS: here is the dox: https://x.com/EinhornGabe/stat....us/20640328510755189

⁣The number one cause of antisemitism is jewish behavior. Imagine if a goy had made a video laughing about jews getting gunned down on October 7th [which was a PSYOP, in any case - VfB].

https://x.com/Leonardaisfunny/....status/2067295723096

County lines are PHONE LINES, not border demarcations. You can’t traffic people over them. The Rape Gang Inquiry Report is junk.

Disgusting Jew reacts to the rape gang report. Laughing at the fact that White children were brutally raped by multiple Muslim men. Make no mistake, the Jews are behind mass immigration into the West.

https://x.com/RebBarrettNSP/st....atus/206725147302132

This woman who was laughing at the grooming gang victims on video is a Councillor for Shropshire on the payroll of Reform UK!
Share this around and spread the word!

https://x.com/illegalantics/st....atus/206707671979463

THE RAPE GANG INQUIRY REPORT:

https://static1.squarespace.co....m/static/6810978a41b

Source: https://x.com/Donna_Rachel_/st....atus/206691946694906

⁣A San Francisco judge freed a violent convict, fearing prison was "too hard."

He then murdered an elder.

Should we impeach and jail lenient judges?

A. Yes
B. No

Source: https://x.com/WHLeavitt/status/2067174641890677055

A San Francisco judge ordered probation for the man who was convicted in the 2021 death of an elderly man endearingly known as "Grandpa Vicha."

https://www.facebook.com/NBCBa....yArea/videos/a-san-f

A San Francisco judge on Thursday ordered probation for the man who was convicted in the 2021 death of an elderly man endearingly known as "Grandpa Vicha."

During Thursday's hearing, Antoine Watson was sentenced to a total of eight years in the unprovoked attack and death of 84-year-old Vicha Ratanapakdee. Since Watson – 19 years old at the time of the attack but now 25 – has already served five years in jail and earned additional credit for good behavior, Judge Linda Colfax suspended the remaining two years of his sentence and ordered him to be released on probation.

In January, a jury found Watson guilty of involuntary manslaughter and assault for the violent attack that happened in San Francisco's Anza Vista neighborhood in January 2021. The attack was caught on camera and became a flashpoint in the "Stop Asian Hate" movement.

The jury acquitted Watson of murder and elder abuse charges, but they determined there were two aggravating factors present, including the claim the attack involved a high degree of cruelty and callousness and that the victim was particularly vulnerable.

Thursday's sentencing decision was devastating for Ratanapakdee's family.

"I didn't get justice for my father and justice for my family," Ratanapakdee's daughter Monthanus said.

The family was especially critical of Colfax. They said she unfairly kept some details of Watson's prior juvenile record from the jury but considered his successful completion of juvenile probation in her sentencing decision.

"The judge already had in mind what she was going to do, in my opinion," Eric Lawson, Ratanapakdee's son-in-law, said. "And they just carried it out. Her and the defense worked very well together."

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/new....s/local/grandpa-vich