WOMAN WHO LIVES ONLY 1.6 MILES FROM THE META DATA CENTER IN WISCONSIN SPEAKS OUT ON DAMAGED WATER❗

⁣Woman who lives only 1.6 miles from the META Data Center in Wisconsin speaks out

She says their water system has been completely destroyed

She says there is discharge that turns the entire river white like milk. She paid for testing and found extremely high heavy metal levels

“I live on a horse farm and I am an educator. I, for almost four 50 years, a natural creek has flowed through my property. It's 20 feet wide, up to four feet deep. It has persisted through drought, flood, seasonal change. It's part of a connected system. Groundwater, tributaries, watersheds, aquifers ultimately flowing into Beaver Dam Lake. Until construction began upstream on the data center, its behavior was stable and predictable

After construction started, all of that changed. Here in Beaver Dam, the creek began to stop flowing entirely without rainfall. It would abruptly return off in cloudy and opaque like milk, with enough force to cause drastic erosion and damage — Water testing on my property shows elevated strontium, a very dangerous metal, and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence”

Source: https://x.com/WallStreetApes/s....tatus/20439132437444

Thumbnail: https://x.com/SharonPatr21273/....status/2043927480197

Thoughts [query to GROK]:

Beaver Dam, Wisconsin resident Maily Kocinski reports that Meta data center construction 1.6 miles away altered her property's natural creek, causing it to stop flowing without rain, turn milky white with erosion, and show elevated strontium plus other heavy metals in independent tests.
AI data centers rely on massive evaporative cooling that consumes millions of gallons daily, concentrating minerals and contaminants in discharge or disturbed groundwater, raising local aquifer and surface water concerns across multiple U.S. sites.

Public meetings and testing in Beaver Dam highlight resident worries over water quality, energy costs, and construction runoff, while Meta states goals for water-positive operations and wetland restoration in the area.

Has the testing data been posted?

No, the full testing data (such as complete lab reports, raw numerical results, or PDFs) has not been publicly posted online in any accessible form based on available news coverage, social media, or public records.

What is known from reports

Maily Kocinski paid for independent water testing on her property's creek and/or well (reports vary slightly between creek and well samples).

Key findings mentioned:

Elevated strontium levels in well water, reportedly higher than Wisconsin Department of Health guidelines consider safe for drinking.
facebook.com

"Extremely high" aluminum in creek testing, described as consistent with heavy construction activity (e.g., per USGS observations on sediment/runoff from sites like concrete rinsing or excavation).
wkow.com

Other indicators of heavy metals and possible deep groundwater influence, with the creek turning "milky white" and showing erosion when flowing after construction began.

Testing was conducted through or analyzed by UW-Stevens Point (University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point), according to multiple journalist accounts where reporters viewed the lab results in person or via Maily.
instagram.com

She has discussed these results in public meetings, testimony (e.g., Wisconsin Senate Finance Committee), and interviews with local outlets like WKOW, TMJ4, and others.

Availability of raw data

Journalists and residents have seen physical or shared copies of the lab results (e.g., reporters noting they were "shown" the documents), but no scans, full reports, or detailed tables with exact concentrations (in mg/L or other units), dates, or lab methodologies appear to have been uploaded to websites, social media, or public databases.

Coverage remains high-level: "elevated levels" or "extremely high" without specific numbers or side-by-side comparisons to standards.

No links to official DNR, USGS, or Meta responses include the resident's test data.

Related concerns (e.g., other residents testing wells due to dry conditions or construction impacts) are also mentioned without posted raw data.

If Maily or local groups have shared the full reports privately (e.g., at meetings or in group chats), they haven't surfaced publicly as of now. You could reach out directly to her (via public posts or local advocacy groups) or check recent updates from Beaver Dam residents' Facebook groups for any new shares. Wisconsin DNR has visited the site but hasn't publicly released counter-testing data tied to her samples in the coverage.

This situation highlights ongoing resident-driven testing amid construction, but transparency on the exact lab details remains limited.