⁣Meet the Hitler-loving podcaster who's teaching young Christian men to hate - in the name of God [at least, that's what Phil Williams asserts; VfB went to Corey's X account and got the FULL UNEDITED INTERVIEW]

Source: https://x.com/CoreyJMahler/sta....tus/1948145441842847 [by way of https://youtu.be/u12MC1b5G-Q?si=3FUnLMmeOOztjfoE ✡]

Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression

Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring down a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based defense, other techniques must be employed. The success of these techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token opposition party.

Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.

Wax indignant. This is also known as the "How dare you?" gambit.

Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors." (If they tend to believe the "rumors" it must be because they are simply "paranoid" or "hysterical.")

Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspects of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors (or plant false stories) and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.

Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nutcase," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and, of course, "rumor monger." Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives when characterizing their charges and defending the "more reasonable" government and its defenders. You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set up your own "skeptics" to shoot down.

Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money (compared to over-compensated adherents to the government line who, presumably, are not).

Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.

Dismiss the charges as "old news."

Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hangout route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken. With effective damage control, the fall-back position need only be peddled by stooge skeptics to carefully limited markets.

Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.

Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. E.g. We have a completely free press. If evidence exists that the Vince Foster "suicide" note was forged, they would have reported it. They haven't reported it so there is no such evidence. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press who would report the leak.

Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely. E.g. If Foster was murdered, who did it and why?

Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or publicizing distractions.

Lightly report incriminating facts, and then make nothing of them. This is sometimes referred to as "bump and run" reporting.

Baldly and brazenly lie. A favorite way of doing this is to attribute the "facts" furnished the public to a plausible-sounding, but anonymous, source.

Expanding further on numbers 4 and 5, have your own stooges "expose" scandals and champion popular causes. Their job is to pre-empt real opponents and to play 99-yard football. A variation is to pay rich people for the job who will pretend to spend their own money.

Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer to the question, "What could possibly motivate a person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups defending the government and/or the press and harassing genuine critics?" Don t the authorities have defenders enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television? One would think refusing to print critical letters and screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously, it is not.

https://dcdave.com/article3/991228.html

⁣⁣Def not Fashbird2814 - @TonyMichaelX

Source: https://x.com/RoseValley_1488/....status/1951072952038

⁣Jeffrey Daugherty EXPOSED | Satanic shill, liar & sociopath who represents the fall of humanity

⁣https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gnf-8prqNlw&pp=ygUTamVmZiBkYXVnaGVydHkgcGlzcw%3D%3D

⁣Jeff Daughtery Talks Poop & Urine Therapy and Explains How Great at 58 He Feels! True Freedom! Ep 63

⁣https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx5QM2mKfqo


Added audio: ⁣https://www.101soundboards.com..../sounds/36984288-we-


Special thanks to VIDEOBOLT ⁣⚡

⁣Vincent Kennedy - Nothing can stop what's coming.

Source: https://x.com/VincentCrypt46/s....tatus/19558311219310

Thumbnail: https://imgflip.com/i/a3645o [thanks to https://x.com/NotOpCue/status/1955832031214006381 https://x.com/KingArt51769658/....status/1955955808279 and https://x.com/KAGdrogo/status/1956131953314553905 🖲]

Related to the 3rd image in the thumbnail:

911 - PROOF of WHO DID IT!

https://nobinger.com/joomla/in....dex.php/911-terroris

⁣Welcome!

⁣Amazingly, the thumbnail came from Facebook, of all places; the OG account that posted it is https://x.com/cirnosad [OG post was deleted, but here's a response:

https://x.com/historyofzion/st....atus/196597429000566

The OG title of the video is: Charlie Kirk stage shooting exposed - FROMDEATHTOLIFE - GUN CONTROL IS THE NEXT LOCKSTEP

Was the ultimate aim of this operation the passing off of TPUSA to Ben Shapiro⁉

Let's hope that he is roundly REBUKED

Source: https://fakeotube.com/video/86....72/charlie-kirk-stag

The Charlie Kirk shooter's situation just got BIZARRE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDC6OnG14Ao

Watch closely. Do you recognize who's debating with Charlie Kirk?

https://x.com/hustlebitch_/sta....tus/1966341781127110

⁣Gentile News Network™ - Never forget that Netanyahu wrote a book in 1995 saying that militant Islam will "bring down the World Trade Center."

What an odd thing to say

Source: https://x.com/Gentilenewsnet/s....tatus/19661682345683

Thumbnail: https://rediscover911.com/isra....el-ally-or-enemy/it-

http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm

https://infiniteunknown.net/20....12/02/12/911-it-wasn

⁣Clerpatriot - Did she uncover the real reason for the government shutdown? This is shocking! You won’t believe what Desiree Townsend discovered!

Source: https://x.com/clerpatriot/stat....us/19814640668258144

Thumbnail: https://imgflip.com/i/aa1iwe [thanks to https://www.usatoday.com/story..../graphics/2025/03/14 🖲]

Follow up: https://www.tiktok.com/@cheerl....eader4change/video/7

⁣Giant Slenderman or Alien Filmed Doing Push-Ups on Mountain!? Bigfoot Relative?
#giant #alien #slenderman #shapeshifter #bigfoot #sasquatch #fyp #tik #tok #tiktok #scary #mountain #new #review #supernatural #monster #mystery source: https://youtube.com/shorts/cMDg8i7H4p0

https://apps.apple.com/fj/app/....laboratory-run-slend

⁣⁣Twenty-six-year-old business analyst Bethany Magee was set on fire during a horrific attack on a commuter train in Chicago. Police say a man poured gasoline over Magee on a Chicago L train. Magee tried to fight off her attacker and fled but cops say the man followed her and set her ablaze. She was rushed to the hospital with burns covering 60% of her body. There's growing outrage Monday after it was revealed that the suspect is 50-year-old Lawrence Reed, a career criminal with 72 prior arrests.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ot0v9eE_Jnc

⁣The 2012 London Olympic Games opening ceremony had some familiar imagery, including the stadium dressed up as a virus cell, dancing nurses, a viral epidemic, a Greta Thunberg clone, and a caricature which looks an awful lot like Boris Johnson.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujnmQ7Rif6Y

⁣Why would John Podesta want 3 children to attend a party for "entertainment purposes," for an adult party?

The PODESTA & CLINTON emails in connection with Anthony Weiner's laptop exposed disturbing deep state connections to alleged child trafficking networks, abuse, money laundering, and much more, tied to wealthy elites around the world and even in our own government.

The day Clinton's private server info went public, Podesta instructed his aide to delete emails linked to Clinton, Obama, Huma Abedin, and Weiner.

Hillary did the same along with her aide and bleached and destroyed phones and computer storage with a hammer.

Alarming emails involved Tamera Luzzatto (Hillary's former chief of staff), who allegedly ran "Evie's Crib"—a password-protected site with inappropriate photos of her children/grandchildren, offering paid "Raw and Uncut" access to her own grandchildren. WHAT?

One email from Luzzatto offered children (aged 11, 9, almost 7) to Podesta for "entertainment" at an adult party.

Another email is to Tony Podesta from Marina Abramović, asking if he, "Tony," and John Podesta will attend a Spirit Cooking dinner. Spirit cooking involves very deep Satanic origins and disturbing ingredients from the human body.

Other emails used bizarre FBI confirmed pedoph*le code words, like:

"Do you think I'll do better playing DOMINOS on CHEESE than on PASTA?" and "The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a MAP that seems PIZZA-RELATED).

The mainstream media also ignored these emails, including, the mentioning of "sacrificing a chicken to Moloch (the Canaanite god of child sacrifice)."

And Obama allegedly ordering "$65,000 worth of hot dogs to The White House from Chicago," even though ordering food outside of The White House is forbidden due to poisoning and such, and the person in the email asks if they're using the same channels, which means, "communications." Why would they use special channels to communicate about food?

Your alarm bells should be going off that something very odd, bizarre, and sick, is going on here. There are so many more mentioning torture rooms, and many other disturbing pics and messages from very wealthy prominent elites.

The million dollar question is, "Where is the justice for the trafficking of CHILDREN?"

The answer to this connects to the blackmail operations from the CIA, British, and other foreign intelligence agency's blackmail operations of our own government officials.

This is just ONE of many dark layers to the overall big picture. We must hold people accountable and remove all blackmail from our government or this is all for nothing.

Source: https://x.com/TheSCIF/status/2001719440543764858

More on this location
⁣https://altcast.tv/v/63iQt2
⁣Squatting In Abandoned Slum Train Cars Against The Rule Of Law NONenforced Around Jacksonville FL US

⁣"The 5 Dancing Israelis" - The true story of "Who committed the 9/11 attack??"

A clip recounting the episode of Israeli television on X led to an expired YouTube video titled "Dancing Israelis" - The Truth Behind 9/11’s Most Bizarre Story", which has been replaced by a very short clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lquYaVDp80k

Source: https://vk.com/video-157237914_456240420

Gemini's AI Overview:
"The 5 Dancing Israelis" refers to five Israeli men who were arrested in New Jersey on 9/11 after being seen celebrating, filming, and jumping on a van as the World Trade Center towers fell, sparking conspiracy theories about Israeli foreknowledge of the attacks, though they were later linked to the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, with their activities deemed "patsy" surveillance rather than involvement.

DOESN'T EXPLAIN AS TO HOW THEY ANTICIPATED THE ATTACK

Dancing Israelis refers to five Israeli men, Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shimuel and Omar Marmari, who were arrested on September 11th, 2001 after they were reported to be acting in a celebratory manner as the attacks took place in New York City. An FBI investigation of the five men found that two were connected to Mossad, but they were ultimately released without charge. Suspicion continued to trail the five men, and photos released by the FBI under the Freedom of Information Act several years after the attacked further fueled suspicions the men were connected to the attacks.

During the 9/11 attacks in New York City, five men were reported the police by a New York woman identified as "Maria" for appearing to be reacting the planes hitting the Twin Towers in a celebratory manner, "jumping" and "high-fiving."The men were linked to a company called "Urban Moving Systems" and were seen near a white van. The five men were detained later that day and police found "maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters, $4,700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports." Bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and reacted as if they had smelled explosives. The FBI discovered that two of the men, Sivan Kurzberg and Paul Kurzberg, were Mossad agents. The five men were ultimately released without charge, and argued their behavior was simply immature behavior.

TLDR: It is ''now'' a lost video of 5 jewish men (Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shimuel and Omar Marmari) jumping/celebrating/dancing during the 9/11 attacks. They ''just seem to be there'' while the planes were going through the towers. They were arrested but subsequently released after their Mossad ties became appearent. Now, a lot of people claimed to have seen the footage of dancing israelis. Probably through amateur recording or even cctv. It was on youtube but ultimately was taken down shortly after.


https://thegrayzone.com/2021/0....9/11/dancing-israeli

https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1

https://archive.org/details/youtube-FuQz6ej7hT4

https://www.haaretz.com/2001-0....9-17/ty-article/5-is

https://www.heraldscotland.com..../news/12768362.five-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98u5K448WQc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3t9pkF31wo

https://www.reddit.com/r/lostm....edia/comments/vjmvzg

Interaction with GROK:

⁣https://x.com/ounkaonx/status/....2009577930847145986?

The post references a real 2001 incident where five Israeli nationals, employed by a moving company, were arrested in New Jersey on September 11 after witnesses reported them filming the World Trade Center attacks from a rooftop and appearing celebratory; FBI investigations found no evidence of foreknowledge or involvement in the plot, leading to their deportation after 71 days.
In a November 2001 Israeli TV interview featured in the post's video, one detainee stated their "purpose was to document the event," which he clarified as reacting to the unfolding attacks from a terror-experienced perspective, though the phrasing has fueled decades of conspiracy theories about Mossad ties, as detailed in declassified FBI reports and ABC News coverage.
Posted on January 9, 2026, amid resurgent online discussions of 9/11 anomalies, the thread's 132 replies largely echo skepticism about official narratives, highlighting how such claims persist due to ambiguous wording and unproven intelligence links, without peer-reviewed evidence supporting advance knowledge.

How does one document an event that one purportedly hasn't have any knowledge of previously?

Searching the web
31 results
The famous (and frequently quoted) phrase "Our purpose was to document the event" comes from an Israeli television interview given by one of the five detained men (most sources attribute it to Oded Ellner) shortly after their deportation back to Israel in late 2001.The sentence is almost always presented in English as a standalone bombshell implying foreknowledge — the core puzzle you're pointing at: How do you plan to "document" something you claim you had no advance knowledge of?Two main interpretations exist
The conspiracy reading (very popular online)
The phrasing is taken literally and prospectively: they went there with the premeditated intention of documenting this specific event before it began → therefore they must have known it was coming → therefore foreknowledge (and often implied involvement).
This view treats the sentence as a Freudian slip or careless admission.
The prosaic / retrospective reading (supported by official investigations and some contextual translations)
The men are explaining, after the fact, why they started filming once the attacks were already underway.
The full quote in many sources is embedded in a longer statement something like:
"The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
In this context, "our purpose" refers to their immediate motivation once the first plane hit and the disaster was visibly unfolding: as Israelis accustomed to terror attacks back home, they instinctively grabbed cameras to record what was clearly a major historic/terror event — not that they set out that morning planning to film a specific attack on the World Trade Center.In everyday English (and even more so in translated Hebrew → English), people often use "was" in retrospective explanations this way:
"I went to the window to see what was happening" (said after the fact)
"We rushed there to help the victims" (explaining motivation during/after an unfolding event)
The phrasing sounds awkward or suspicious in English precisely because it's a direct (and not particularly polished) translation from Hebrew, delivered in a casual TV interview setting.
What the investigations concludedMultiple U.S. agencies (FBI, 9/11 Commission reporting, etc.) looked into the incident extensively:
The men arrived at the Doric Towers vantage point after the first plane hit (eyewitness timing varies, but most place it post-impact)
They were detained, questioned at length, polygraphed, and investigated for weeks
FBI ultimately concluded they had no foreknowledge of the attacks and no involvement in planning or executing them
They were deported for visa violations (working illegally on tourist visas), not terrorism charges
The "dancing" / celebratory behavior reported by one eyewitness (high-fives, appearing happy) was never fully reconciled — some accounts say it looked like joy at the attack itself, while defenders argue it could have been relief/shock/excitement that "the Americans will finally understand what Israel deals with" — but it was never legally tied to advance knowledge.Bottom lineYou can't logically plan to document a specific surprise attack you have no knowledge of.
The two possibilities are therefore:
They did have foreknowledge → and the sentence is a genuine (if clumsy) admission
They didn't → and the sentence is simply a poorly worded, retrospective explanation of why they filmed an enormous, once-in-a-generation terror attack once it had already started
Official U.S. investigations landed on door #2.
The sentence continues to fuel debate mostly because of its inherently ambiguous phrasing in translation + the emotionally charged context of 9/11.

31 web pages

Full transcript of Ellner interview

Mossad's US operations history

How does one document an event that one purportedly hasn't have any knowledge of previously?

Searching the web
29 results
The short, honest answer to your question is: You can't — at least not in the prospective, premeditated sense that the phrase most naturally suggests in English when taken out of context.If someone truly had zero prior knowledge of a specific surprise event, they could not have set out that morning with the deliberate purpose of documenting that exact event. The logic is airtight, and this is precisely why the sentence "Our purpose was to document the event" (spoken by Oded Ellner on Israeli television shortly after their return home) has remained one of the most quoted and debated lines in all of 9/11 discussion for over two decades.Two competing explanations people actually give
The "slip / admission" interpretation (dominant in skeptical / alternative communities)
The statement is taken at face value: they went there intending to document this specific attack → therefore they (or someone directing them) must have known in advance.
This reading treats the phrasing as either:
a careless admission of foreknowledge, or
confirmation they were on some kind of surveillance/documentary assignment that anticipated a major event.
Supporters usually point out that the grammar sounds prospective ("purpose was to document" = the intention they had before it started), and they combine it with other disputed details (timing of arrival, reported behavior, camera setup, etc.).
The "awkward retrospective explanation" interpretation (official investigations + some defenders)
The men are speaking after the fact, in a casual TV interview, trying to explain their motivation once the attack became visible.
The fuller context usually given is something close to:
"The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
In this reading, "purpose" refers to their immediate reaction after the first plane hit:
They saw a massive, historic terror attack unfolding (something they claim felt familiar from experience in Israel).
They instinctively decided "this needs to be documented" → grabbed a camera → filmed.
In casual, translated speech, people frequently describe motivations this way in hindsight:
"We ran over to help the injured" (said after the emergency is over)
"I turned on the camera to capture what was happening"
The English translation from Hebrew sounds stilted and suspicious because:
It's a direct, not-very-polished translation.
Hebrew-to-English tense/motivation phrasing often feels off in exactly this way.
The speaker was young, not a native English speaker, and probably not thinking about how the line would be dissected for 25 years.
What actually happened according to investigationsThe FBI's multi-month investigation (multiple declassified sections released over the years) concluded:
No evidence the five men had foreknowledge of the attacks.
No evidence of involvement in planning or execution.
They were deported for immigration violations (working illegally), not terrorism-related charges.
At least two had loose prior connections to Israeli intelligence (not unusual for young Israeli men who do mandatory service), but nothing tied to 9/11 advance knowledge.
The phrase continues to be radioactive because it is genuinely ambiguous in English — especially when quoted alone without the "terror daily" preface — and because the whole incident (behavior reports, company owner fleeing, etc.) already felt strange to many people.In the end, you either accept that it's a clumsy, post-facto wording by non-native speakers… or you don't. There's no third logically clean option. The sentence simply doesn't sit comfortably either way — which is exactly why it refuses to die.

29 web pages

Full transcript of Ellner's interview

Other 9/11 foreknowledge claims

You said earlier that "Official U.S. investigations landed on door #2." - doesn't that fly in the face of logic once it was revealed that they were Mossad assets?

Searching the web
22 results

Browsing web page
2 results
The reports of Mossad connections to at least some of the five Israelis (often called the "Dancing Israelis") do add a layer of intrigue, but they don't inherently contradict the official U.S. investigations' conclusions of no foreknowledge or involvement in 9/11—though they certainly fuel skepticism and alternative interpretations. Let's break this down based on what's been reported over the years, drawing from declassified documents, media investigations, and official statements.The Reported Mossad Ties
Key claims from media and leaks: A 2002 article in The Forward (a respected Jewish-American publication) cited a U.S. official briefed on the case, who stated that the FBI assessed Urban Moving Systems (the men's employer) as a "front for the Mossad" and that at least two of the detainees were Mossad operatives. Their alleged mission: surveilling Arab communities in the U.S., particularly those with potential ties to radical groups. This aligns with broader reports of Israeli intelligence operations in the U.S. around that time, including the "Israeli art students" affair, where dozens of young Israelis (some with military/intelligence backgrounds) were detained for suspicious activities near federal buildings and later deported.
Declassified FBI documents: Portions released over the years (e.g., in 2006, 2011, and 2019 via FOIA) confirm investigations into these connections. For instance, at least one detainee (Paul Kurzberg) had a prior link to Mossad from work in another country, and names appeared in a CIA-FBI foreign intelligence database. The docs note polygraph tests (some failed initially but passed later), searches of their van and apartments (finding maps, cash, and film), and scrutiny of their employer, whose owner (Dominik Suter) fled to Israel shortly after. However, these same documents emphasize that no direct evidence tied them to the 9/11 plotters or advance knowledge of the specific attacks.
Broader context: Israeli intelligence (Mossad) did provide general warnings to the U.S. in August 2001 about a potential major al-Qaeda attack involving "200 terrorists" in the U.S., but these were vague and not specific to planes-as-weapons or the World Trade Center. Some reports suggest Mossad was tracking hijackers like Mohamed Atta in Florida, living near suspected Israeli "spy cells," but this is based on a 2001 French intelligence report and has never been officially confirmed as linked to the five in New Jersey.
Why This Doesn't Necessarily "Fly in the Face" of Official Conclusions
Official stance (Door #2): The FBI, 9/11 Commission, and other U.S. agencies (after 71 days of detention, interrogations, and clearances) ruled that the men had no foreknowledge or role in the attacks. They were deported solely for visa violations (working illegally on tourist visas), not terrorism charges. ABC News in 2002 quoted FBI sources saying there was "nothing" linking them to 9/11 planning, despite the Mossad surveillance angle. The logic here: If they were Mossad assets, their presence could be explained as part of routine counter-terrorism ops monitoring Arab networks—not a specific setup for 9/11. Arriving at the vantage point after the first plane hit (per timelines in FBI reports) and filming could be opportunistic "documentation" of an unfolding event they recognized as terror-related, given Israel's experience with such attacks.
The logic puzzle: You're right that Mossad ties make the "no foreknowledge" claim harder to swallow for many—especially with the ambiguous "document the event" quote, their celebratory behavior (interpreted by some as schadenfreude or "now America gets it"), and the company's front-like setup. If they were there to spy on Arabs, why film the towers so prominently? Why the high-fives? Conspiracy views see this as evidence of a deeper Israeli role (e.g., false flag or passive complicity). But officially, it's framed as coincidental: They were in the area for work/surveillance, saw the smoke, set up to record a major news event, and their reactions were misinterpreted or culturally contextual.
Unresolved ambiguities: No peer-reviewed or fully transparent evidence has overturned the official findings in 25 years. Critics argue the investigations were incomplete or influenced by U.S.-Israel alliances, but that's speculative. The 2019 FBI photo releases (showing them with NYC skyline pre-attack? Wait, no—most are post-arrest) have reignited debate, but even those docs reiterate no terrorism ties.
In short, the Mossad "revelation" (which isn't new—it's been reported since 2002) complicates the narrative but doesn't logically invalidate the official "no foreknowledge" conclusion, as the alleged spying was on general threats, not the specific 9/11 operation. If you buy the prosaic explanation, it holds; if not, it looks like a cover-up. The truth likely sits in that gray area, as with many 9/11 loose ends.

25 web pages

Israeli art students affair

Mossad warnings to CIA

⁣https://x.com/i/grok?conversat....ion=2010040887863070

⁣This is the full interview between me and Channel 5 (Andrew Callaghan).

Thanks for watching, if you enjoyed this video consider subscribing for more interviews and videos across the world!

Subscribe to Nicks Main Channel: / @nickshirley

I will be responding to comments down below.

https://x.com/nickshirleyy
/ nickshirley
https://www.facebook.com/peopl....e/Nick-Shirleyy/6155

Want to donate?
Venmo: Nickshirley21
Cashapp: $nickshirley21

Nick Shirley Interview [Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan]

Go to https://ground.news/channel5 to stay fully informed with all sides of every story. Subscribe for 40% off the Vantage plan through my link.

Also, our ongoing coverage of the scene on the ground in Minneapolis after the Renee Good shooting will release soon. This interview with Nick was conducted before all of that.

AC

00:00:00 — Viral Minnesota Fraud Exposé
00:05:00 — Daycare Investigation & Community Reaction
00:09:00 — Involvement of Political Figures & Data Sources
00:14:00 — Nick’s Personal Backstory & Upbringing
00:22:00 — Government Mismanagement & Migration as a Political Tool
00:32:00 — Stereotypes, Somali Community, and Controversy
00:37:00 — Mainstream vs. Independent Media & Trust
00:42:00 — Affordability Crisis, Government Trust, and Trump
00:52:00 — Billionaires, Taxes, and Policy Impact
00:57:00 — Political Choices, Two-Party System, and Solutions
01:02:00 — Cultural Compatibility and The NGO Iceberg
01:05:00 — Closing Thoughts: Personal Risk & Hope for Change

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IrMqA3fVO0

Nick Shirley Response [from Andrew Callaghan]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlyNHpEe_k4

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAosh7d_j_w

⁣Please watch the full video to hear my defense’s response to Camp Kanakuk’s attorneys’ demand letter requesting the removal of parts of my interview with Ro Khanna. If you would like to read both letters yourself, you can do so here:

https://drive.google.com/drive..../u/0/folders/1-anLwZ

Watch the FULL episode with Elizabeth Phillips: • Elizabeth Phillips - Camp Kanakuk: Exposing One of the World’s Largest Summer Camps | SRS #272
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vQriYkW8KQ

Watch the FULL episode with Ro Khanna: • Ro Khanna - Unpacking What Could Be One of the Biggest Scandals in 100 Years | SRS #271
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euyRmOQyhIs

#podcast #shawnryan #shawnryanshow #news #currentaffairs source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lY-pV4RS1A

https://washingtonian.com/2020..../12/04/the-comet-pin

⁣Here is an hour-long video breaking down many of the players in the Trump Admin/Sphere of Influence, and their various bi-partisan ties to corrupt, Zionist, Transhumanist, Technocratic, Intelligence, Globalist interests both foreign and domestic.

Epstein, Peter Thiel, Big Pharma, Big Banking, Big Tech, Military, Soros, Israel, former Presidents, and so much more.

Plots, scams, schemes, and lies.

Feel free to pause the video at any point, and verify it all for yourself.

And we're still just scratching the surface...

Source: https://x.com/7SEES_/status/1896385479291142197

⁣LOL: Watch How These Losers on The View Changed Their Stance after Whoopi's Name was Dropped in the Epstein Files

This footage showing how the ladies on The View changed their stance after Whoopi Goldberg's name was dropped in the Epstein files.

Source: https://theworldwatch.com/vide....os/1611666/lol-watch

⁣https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7-IbkK-5BI&feature=youtu.be
RudeAI News: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCVe8F7BwKT_QxJd0F
AI Explains Organ Harvesting And The Pandemic
Pinned by Rude A.I. News
idefix21
00:00 Intro
01:04 How To Sell Your Body For $46 Million
04:23 Presumed Consent Opt-Out Organ Donation Laws
07:04 Euthanize And Harvest Laws
09:44 Young Blood
17:44 Fetal Tissue Retention Scandals
26:55 Planned Parenthood
29:12 COVID WHO Guidelines; Organs Are Suitable For Transplants
34:14 How COVID Patients Were Over-Treated to Death
40:03 Harvesting Stem Cells From Dead Bodies
How to Sell Your Body for $46 Million https://people.well.com/user/justpat/bodyparts.pdf
Organ Donation Law in England
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22JdKKPB3P4
Bioethicist: Let Doctors Kill the Healthy by Harvesting Organs https://www.nationalreview.com..../corner/bioethicist-
Hospitals To Be Paid To Harvest Organs https://www.wsj.com/video/hosp....itals-to-be-paid-to-
‘Youth transplants’ really can slow the ageing process https://www.telegraph.co.uk/ne....ws/2022/05/14/stanfo
Young Blood: Using A Teen's Blood To Reverse Aging
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOt7YMVia94
NHS to harvest babies' organs https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ne....ws/article-3478477/N
Modern-day infanticide in Maryland? https://wng.org/opinions/moder....n-day-infanticide-in
California Follows Maryland's Lead With Disturbing Bill That Could Effectively Legalize Infanticide https://aclj.org/pro-life/cali....fornia-follows-maryl
EYES OF THE DEVIL. A DOCUMENTARY FILM BY PATRYK VEGA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1y38N4LQiU
Los Angeles fetus disposal scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....Los_Angeles_fetus_di
17,000 ABORTED BABIES FOUND WITH ‘HEADS CHOPPED OFF’ IN STORAGE CONTAINER IN LOS ANGELES https://www.bitchute.com/video/jTPQTgxZ4VP5
Alder Hey organs scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....Alder_Hey_organs_sca
Alder Hey organ retention scandal: a timeline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23t_w7yxDjs
Aborted babies discovered in DC may indicate infanticide after attempted abortions https://www.liveaction.org/new....s/infant-bodies-infa
Discovered infant bodies may indicate infanticide after attempted abortions [GRAPHIC CONTENT]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HslaMej6TlA
Planned Parenthood Uses Partial-Birth Abortions to Sell Baby Parts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjxwVuozMnU
How Trump’s fetal-tissue policy impacts medical research https://www.spectrumnews.org/n....ews/trumps-fetal-tis
Fetal Tissue Attack Is Latest Tactic In Long GOP Fight Against Planned Parenthood https://khn.org/news/fetal-tis....sue-attack-is-latest
Infection Prevention and Control for the safe management of a dead body in the context of COVID-19 https://apps.who.int/iris/bits....tream/handle/10665/3
The Bodies of People Who Died from COVID-19 May Still Be Contagious https://www.scientificamerican.....com/article/the-bod
What’s really going on with Covid deaths data? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-60000391
Bodies to be sent to mortuaries within 2 hrs, says Delhi government’s health department https://www.nationalheraldindi....a.com/national/covid
How COVID Patients Were Over-Treated to Death, by Joseph Mercola https://straightlinelogic.com/....2022/02/16/how-covid
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PVuBgi3zJcNK/?l
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xbA4TP0cxmKn
Amazingly, YouTube still affixed their retarded COVID alert:
💉🙃COVID-19 | Get the latest information from the CDC about COVID-19💉🙃
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru....s/2019-ncov/index.ht
Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32305024/
https://www.dw.com/en/covid-ar....tificial-intelligenc

Glory to the Peter Muskrat Army!

Communism was not created by the masses to overthrow the bankers, Communism was created by the bankers to overthrow and enslave the masses.
“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators. “We cannot state that all Jews are Bolsheviks. But: without Jews there would have been no Bolshevism. For a Jew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood maddened Jewish terrorists murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.”
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and victim of Jewish Bolshevism.
Official page for the documentary: https://europathelastbattle.wordpress.com