⁣📰 Go to https://ground.news/mf to see what mainstream media won’t show you. Save 40% off the Ground News Vantage plan and take back control of how you stay informed.
🍷 Have you tried my wine yet?: https://franzesewine.com/
💪🏼 Join Franzese Family: https://michaelfranzese.com/family/

I know, I know—another Epstein video. You’re probably sick of hearing about it.

But here’s why I can’t let this die: they’re counting on us getting tired, moving on, forgetting about it. That’s exactly what they want.

I sat down with Nick Bryant, the investigative journalist who released Epstein’s Black Book and flight logs back in 2015—before any of this was mainstream news. He’s got new information on the DOJ’s latest cover-up, and it’s worse than you think. We get into why Pam Bondi promised transparency then delivered redacted pages. Why Mike Johnson Destroyed the House investigation before it could even get a vote. And why both sides—Republicans and Democrats—are working overtime to bury this.

This isn’t about politics. It’s about children being abus*d by people with money and power—and a system that protects the predators instead of the victims.

They want us to forget. I’m not letting that happen.

The Journalist Who Leaked Epstein’s Secrets Reveals What’s Still Hidden


🤝 Book 1 on 1 Call With Me: https://michaelfranzese.com/book-1-on-1-call/
🔥 Check out my store: https://store.michaelfranzese.com/
🎙 Michael Franzese Podcast on Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3Eo39qb
?️ Michael Franzese Podcast on Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3Eo39qb

0:00 Introduction
2:17 Nick Bryant: Epstein Investigation Expert
3:35 Black Book Released in 2015
4:33 Both Parties Covering Up Truth
9:29 Pam Bondi's Nothing Sandwich Promise
10:07 More Info Released Than DOJ
15:32 300 Gigabytes, 1000 Victims Found
16:29 Government Claims Epstein Acted Alone
18:02 Trump's Liability in Epstein Case
19:16 Trump Circled in Black Book
22:08 Both Parties Are Compromised
23:35 Trump Opened Pandora's Box
26:35 Clinton Had 24 Phone Numbers
28:40 Virginia Giuffre's Corroborating Testimony
30:25 J. Edgar Hoover Blackmail Parallel
31:03 Epstein's Blackmail Operation Exposed
34:13 Mossad and CIA Connections
38:21 Mike Markowitz Gas Scam Reference
41:05 Government Corruption Runs Deep
44:19 De*th Threats for Investigating
48:50 Ghislaine Maxwell Takes the Fifth
50:40 Maxwell Got Easy Treatment
53:09 Mike Johnson Kil*ed House Investigation
56:09 Trump's Possible Strategic Play
59:49 Diddy Case Also Whitewashed
1:02:09 Comey's Daughter as Prosecutor
1:04:40 Epstein Justice Organization Launched

Backbone Media Group

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7v7K3mcAAE8

⁣Henri Fjord - The agenda becomes clearer.

Now that Charlie Kirk is gone, jews like Ben Shapiro and Rabbi Shmuley are rushing to fill the vacuum.

It’s a battle to regain the minds of the youth.

Source: https://x.com/henri_fjord/stat....us/19662839698524857

Thumbnail: https://x.com/Hamed51028/statu....s/196633750059680991

⁣Rabbi boasts, 'We start wars and send Christians to fight them for us, Christians are the broom.'
Source: https://gab.com/BeachMilk/posts/113056248037954189
Thumbnail: https://gab.com/DarenFromDelaw....are/posts/1130563862
Once you comprehend the FACT of the wooden doors 🚪 you can no longer be fooled

⁣On October 6, 2025, conservative podcaster Candace Owens publicly shared screenshots from a private nine-person group chat (likely on Telegram) involving Charlie Kirk, the late founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), sent just 48 hours before his assassination on September 10, 2025. The messages, which Owens claimed showed Kirk's growing frustration with pro-Israel donors and his intent to distance himself from the "pro-Israel cause," have fueled ongoing debate about his death and deepened divisions within "MAGA" circles.

___

Like this video? I could use your help to keep making them:

BECOME A CHANNEL MEMBER:
https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCkeGEMunZIoGUyP7z

JOHN'S NEW BOOK - UNCONSCIOUS PURSUIT
https://amzn.to/4234XwC

PATRONAGE/ONE-TIME DONATIONS
https://www.patreon.com/JohnWard
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/RealJohnWard

WORLD CHAMPION MERCH
https://my-store-f4e9d5.creator-spring.com

GUILDED
https://www.guilded.gg/r/zzR0K87dAj?i=myxa2p1d

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cbvJph_qoI

⁣https://www.theepochtimes.com/....former-first-lady-me ⁣💐⁣


The Real Story of January 6 | Documentary
EpochTV Live - https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-real-story-of-jan-6-documentary_4596670.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily
EPOCHTV LIVE
We’re making the documentary available FREE online for all viewers now through the end of September.

SHARE this documentary with as many of your friends as possible.
(Deadline: September 30, 2022)

–
“The Real Story of January 6,” a documentary by The Epoch Times, reveals the truth that has been hidden from the American people. While a narrative has been set that what took place that day was an insurrection, key events and witnesses have been ignored until now. The documentary takes an unvarnished look at police use of force and the deaths that resulted in some measure from it. The film asks tough questions about who was responsible for the chaos that day. With compelling interviews and exclusive video footage, the documentary tells the real story of January 6. The film is narrated by Joshua Philipp, host of “Crossroads” on EpochTV and a senior investigative reporter at The Epoch Times.

Jasper Fakkert, editor-in-chief of The Epoch Times, said: “There has been a narrative perpetuated about January 6 that omits many of the facts about what happened that day.

“With in-depth interviews and exclusive video footage, we take an objective look at the issues, the people, and the impacts of the events.”

The film takes a close look at the shooting of 35-year-old Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt and the deaths of three other supporters of former President Donald J. Trump. It analyzes the police response to the massive crowds and use of force around the U.S. Capitol.

It examines the human impacts of Jan. 6, including the suicide of one defendant and the long pretrial imprisonment of dozens of others. It also investigates claims that some attacks on the Capitol and police were carried out by unindicted suspicious actors.

–

What Really Happened on January 6? | The Real Story of January 6
While the dust from Jan. 6, 2021, has long cleared, it has been replaced by a smoke screen. A carefully crafted narrative has been set that claims the events of that day amounted to a “violent insurrection.” This claim, however, does not match the facts. “The Real Story of January 6” takes an objective look at what happened through the eyes of those who were there. The Epoch Times provides the first comprehensive look into what really happened that day. The Truth can’t be hidden.

​
We are Being Censored. Help Spread This Documentary
While this documentary is groundbreaking in providing a complete overview of what happened on January 6, The Epoch Times has been censored and suppressed by Big Tech. In order to spread the documentary, The Epoch Times relies on its own Epoch TV as well as other non-cancelable platforms to spread the truth. Stand up for free speech and oppose censorship by sharing the documentary with as many people as you can.

Share the Documentary the Mainstream Media is Trying to Hide.

–
BUY DVD: The Real Story of Jan. 6 Documentary（102 Minutes, Color) , Promo Code “EpochTV” for 20% off.
–

MEDIA APPEARANCES – Check out what people say about this documentary.
http://j6realstory.com

–
Feature Films:

Cinema collection: http://epochcinema.com
Epoch Original content: http://epochoriginal.com
Feature Films: https://www.theepochtimes.com/featured-films

* Click the “Save” button below the video to access it later on “My List.”

Follow EpochTV on social media:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/EpochTVus
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/EpochTV
Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@EpochTV

Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/epochtv
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EpochTVus
Gab: https://gab.com/EpochTV
Telegram: https://t.me/EpochTV

⁣Wow.
SOURCES
➡https://www.instagram.com/noti....nregz/reel/C_20MylOK
➡https://youtu.be/kRh6598RmHM
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
➡YouTube Memberships: https://bit.ly/39yRdh8
➡PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/Memology101
➡Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/AntonioChavez
OTHER CHANNELS
➡Memology 102: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCBfB4NCL1v1Wx_tMD
➡DSP Tries It - Memology 101: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCTGXPDKjEKJcM9eCV
➡M101 News: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UC9M0fKN795Qje1I5E
ADDITIONAL CREDITS
➡Memology 101 Netflix Intro:
https://www.youtube.com/user/pleasesubscribedad
Trends: #unitedstates #news

⁣King Arthur Fan - Entrance thru the ice wall found ~ you can see a continent on the other side

Source: https://x.com/brandilwells/sta....tus/1979517166387892

Thumbnail: https://x.com/10kVet/status/1979647104869130653

⁣[1988] Hell.Comes.to.Frogtown🐸
154,172 views 🐸 Apr 5, 2017
[1988] Hell.Comes.to.Frogtown.1080p.BluRay

'Hell' is the name of the hero of the story. He's a prisoner of the women who now run the USA after a nuclear/biological war. Results of the war are that mutants have evolved, and the human race is in danger of extinction due to infertility. Hell is given the task of helping in the rescue of a group of fertile women from the harem of the mutant leader (resembling a frog). Hell cannot escape since he has a bomb attached to his private parts which will detonate if he strays more than a few hundred yards from his guard.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093171/?ref_=nv_sr_1



https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0....093171/fullcredits/?



https://screenrant.com/mad-max....-ripoff-hell-frogtow



https://www.encyclopedia.com/a....rts/culture-magazine



Hell Comes to Frogtown ★ 1988 (R)🐸
In a post-nuclear holocaust land run by giant frogs, a renegade who is one of the few non-sterile men left on earth must rescue some fertile women and impregnate them. Scifi spoof is extremely low-budget, but fun. Stars “Rowdy” Roddy Piper of wrestling fame. 88m/C VHS, DVD . Roddy Piper, Sandahl Bergman, Rory Calhoun, Donald G. Jackson, Cec Verrell; D: Robert J. Kizer, Donald G. Jackson; W: Randall Frakes; C: Donald G. Jackson.

⁣Truthstream Media - Wait wait wait. WAIT. Are we… Are we now to the point where Rep. Massie is literally explaining currency devaluation to the rest of Congress like it’s a Kindergarten science class?

Source: https://x.com/truthstreamnews/....status/1844493780462

Massive is the only one in Congress to come forward to mention that a fifth column has taken control of our government, and that handlers are assigned to each member

⁣"The 5 Dancing Israelis" - The true story of "Who committed the 9/11 attack??"

A clip recounting the episode of Israeli television on X led to an expired YouTube video titled "Dancing Israelis" - The Truth Behind 9/11’s Most Bizarre Story", which has been replaced by a very short clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lquYaVDp80k

Source: https://vk.com/video-157237914_456240420

Gemini's AI Overview:
"The 5 Dancing Israelis" refers to five Israeli men who were arrested in New Jersey on 9/11 after being seen celebrating, filming, and jumping on a van as the World Trade Center towers fell, sparking conspiracy theories about Israeli foreknowledge of the attacks, though they were later linked to the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, with their activities deemed "patsy" surveillance rather than involvement.

DOESN'T EXPLAIN AS TO HOW THEY ANTICIPATED THE ATTACK

Dancing Israelis refers to five Israeli men, Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shimuel and Omar Marmari, who were arrested on September 11th, 2001 after they were reported to be acting in a celebratory manner as the attacks took place in New York City. An FBI investigation of the five men found that two were connected to Mossad, but they were ultimately released without charge. Suspicion continued to trail the five men, and photos released by the FBI under the Freedom of Information Act several years after the attacked further fueled suspicions the men were connected to the attacks.

During the 9/11 attacks in New York City, five men were reported the police by a New York woman identified as "Maria" for appearing to be reacting the planes hitting the Twin Towers in a celebratory manner, "jumping" and "high-fiving."The men were linked to a company called "Urban Moving Systems" and were seen near a white van. The five men were detained later that day and police found "maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters, $4,700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports." Bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and reacted as if they had smelled explosives. The FBI discovered that two of the men, Sivan Kurzberg and Paul Kurzberg, were Mossad agents. The five men were ultimately released without charge, and argued their behavior was simply immature behavior.

TLDR: It is ''now'' a lost video of 5 jewish men (Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shimuel and Omar Marmari) jumping/celebrating/dancing during the 9/11 attacks. They ''just seem to be there'' while the planes were going through the towers. They were arrested but subsequently released after their Mossad ties became appearent. Now, a lot of people claimed to have seen the footage of dancing israelis. Probably through amateur recording or even cctv. It was on youtube but ultimately was taken down shortly after.


https://thegrayzone.com/2021/0....9/11/dancing-israeli

https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1

https://archive.org/details/youtube-FuQz6ej7hT4

https://www.haaretz.com/2001-0....9-17/ty-article/5-is

https://www.heraldscotland.com..../news/12768362.five-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98u5K448WQc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3t9pkF31wo

https://www.reddit.com/r/lostm....edia/comments/vjmvzg

Interaction with GROK:

⁣https://x.com/ounkaonx/status/....2009577930847145986?

The post references a real 2001 incident where five Israeli nationals, employed by a moving company, were arrested in New Jersey on September 11 after witnesses reported them filming the World Trade Center attacks from a rooftop and appearing celebratory; FBI investigations found no evidence of foreknowledge or involvement in the plot, leading to their deportation after 71 days.
In a November 2001 Israeli TV interview featured in the post's video, one detainee stated their "purpose was to document the event," which he clarified as reacting to the unfolding attacks from a terror-experienced perspective, though the phrasing has fueled decades of conspiracy theories about Mossad ties, as detailed in declassified FBI reports and ABC News coverage.
Posted on January 9, 2026, amid resurgent online discussions of 9/11 anomalies, the thread's 132 replies largely echo skepticism about official narratives, highlighting how such claims persist due to ambiguous wording and unproven intelligence links, without peer-reviewed evidence supporting advance knowledge.

How does one document an event that one purportedly hasn't have any knowledge of previously?

Searching the web
31 results
The famous (and frequently quoted) phrase "Our purpose was to document the event" comes from an Israeli television interview given by one of the five detained men (most sources attribute it to Oded Ellner) shortly after their deportation back to Israel in late 2001.The sentence is almost always presented in English as a standalone bombshell implying foreknowledge — the core puzzle you're pointing at: How do you plan to "document" something you claim you had no advance knowledge of?Two main interpretations exist
The conspiracy reading (very popular online)
The phrasing is taken literally and prospectively: they went there with the premeditated intention of documenting this specific event before it began → therefore they must have known it was coming → therefore foreknowledge (and often implied involvement).
This view treats the sentence as a Freudian slip or careless admission.
The prosaic / retrospective reading (supported by official investigations and some contextual translations)
The men are explaining, after the fact, why they started filming once the attacks were already underway.
The full quote in many sources is embedded in a longer statement something like:
"The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
In this context, "our purpose" refers to their immediate motivation once the first plane hit and the disaster was visibly unfolding: as Israelis accustomed to terror attacks back home, they instinctively grabbed cameras to record what was clearly a major historic/terror event — not that they set out that morning planning to film a specific attack on the World Trade Center.In everyday English (and even more so in translated Hebrew → English), people often use "was" in retrospective explanations this way:
"I went to the window to see what was happening" (said after the fact)
"We rushed there to help the victims" (explaining motivation during/after an unfolding event)
The phrasing sounds awkward or suspicious in English precisely because it's a direct (and not particularly polished) translation from Hebrew, delivered in a casual TV interview setting.
What the investigations concludedMultiple U.S. agencies (FBI, 9/11 Commission reporting, etc.) looked into the incident extensively:
The men arrived at the Doric Towers vantage point after the first plane hit (eyewitness timing varies, but most place it post-impact)
They were detained, questioned at length, polygraphed, and investigated for weeks
FBI ultimately concluded they had no foreknowledge of the attacks and no involvement in planning or executing them
They were deported for visa violations (working illegally on tourist visas), not terrorism charges
The "dancing" / celebratory behavior reported by one eyewitness (high-fives, appearing happy) was never fully reconciled — some accounts say it looked like joy at the attack itself, while defenders argue it could have been relief/shock/excitement that "the Americans will finally understand what Israel deals with" — but it was never legally tied to advance knowledge.Bottom lineYou can't logically plan to document a specific surprise attack you have no knowledge of.
The two possibilities are therefore:
They did have foreknowledge → and the sentence is a genuine (if clumsy) admission
They didn't → and the sentence is simply a poorly worded, retrospective explanation of why they filmed an enormous, once-in-a-generation terror attack once it had already started
Official U.S. investigations landed on door #2.
The sentence continues to fuel debate mostly because of its inherently ambiguous phrasing in translation + the emotionally charged context of 9/11.

31 web pages

Full transcript of Ellner interview

Mossad's US operations history

How does one document an event that one purportedly hasn't have any knowledge of previously?

Searching the web
29 results
The short, honest answer to your question is: You can't — at least not in the prospective, premeditated sense that the phrase most naturally suggests in English when taken out of context.If someone truly had zero prior knowledge of a specific surprise event, they could not have set out that morning with the deliberate purpose of documenting that exact event. The logic is airtight, and this is precisely why the sentence "Our purpose was to document the event" (spoken by Oded Ellner on Israeli television shortly after their return home) has remained one of the most quoted and debated lines in all of 9/11 discussion for over two decades.Two competing explanations people actually give
The "slip / admission" interpretation (dominant in skeptical / alternative communities)
The statement is taken at face value: they went there intending to document this specific attack → therefore they (or someone directing them) must have known in advance.
This reading treats the phrasing as either:
a careless admission of foreknowledge, or
confirmation they were on some kind of surveillance/documentary assignment that anticipated a major event.
Supporters usually point out that the grammar sounds prospective ("purpose was to document" = the intention they had before it started), and they combine it with other disputed details (timing of arrival, reported behavior, camera setup, etc.).
The "awkward retrospective explanation" interpretation (official investigations + some defenders)
The men are speaking after the fact, in a casual TV interview, trying to explain their motivation once the attack became visible.
The fuller context usually given is something close to:
"The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
In this reading, "purpose" refers to their immediate reaction after the first plane hit:
They saw a massive, historic terror attack unfolding (something they claim felt familiar from experience in Israel).
They instinctively decided "this needs to be documented" → grabbed a camera → filmed.
In casual, translated speech, people frequently describe motivations this way in hindsight:
"We ran over to help the injured" (said after the emergency is over)
"I turned on the camera to capture what was happening"
The English translation from Hebrew sounds stilted and suspicious because:
It's a direct, not-very-polished translation.
Hebrew-to-English tense/motivation phrasing often feels off in exactly this way.
The speaker was young, not a native English speaker, and probably not thinking about how the line would be dissected for 25 years.
What actually happened according to investigationsThe FBI's multi-month investigation (multiple declassified sections released over the years) concluded:
No evidence the five men had foreknowledge of the attacks.
No evidence of involvement in planning or execution.
They were deported for immigration violations (working illegally), not terrorism-related charges.
At least two had loose prior connections to Israeli intelligence (not unusual for young Israeli men who do mandatory service), but nothing tied to 9/11 advance knowledge.
The phrase continues to be radioactive because it is genuinely ambiguous in English — especially when quoted alone without the "terror daily" preface — and because the whole incident (behavior reports, company owner fleeing, etc.) already felt strange to many people.In the end, you either accept that it's a clumsy, post-facto wording by non-native speakers… or you don't. There's no third logically clean option. The sentence simply doesn't sit comfortably either way — which is exactly why it refuses to die.

29 web pages

Full transcript of Ellner's interview

Other 9/11 foreknowledge claims

You said earlier that "Official U.S. investigations landed on door #2." - doesn't that fly in the face of logic once it was revealed that they were Mossad assets?

Searching the web
22 results

Browsing web page
2 results
The reports of Mossad connections to at least some of the five Israelis (often called the "Dancing Israelis") do add a layer of intrigue, but they don't inherently contradict the official U.S. investigations' conclusions of no foreknowledge or involvement in 9/11—though they certainly fuel skepticism and alternative interpretations. Let's break this down based on what's been reported over the years, drawing from declassified documents, media investigations, and official statements.The Reported Mossad Ties
Key claims from media and leaks: A 2002 article in The Forward (a respected Jewish-American publication) cited a U.S. official briefed on the case, who stated that the FBI assessed Urban Moving Systems (the men's employer) as a "front for the Mossad" and that at least two of the detainees were Mossad operatives. Their alleged mission: surveilling Arab communities in the U.S., particularly those with potential ties to radical groups. This aligns with broader reports of Israeli intelligence operations in the U.S. around that time, including the "Israeli art students" affair, where dozens of young Israelis (some with military/intelligence backgrounds) were detained for suspicious activities near federal buildings and later deported.
Declassified FBI documents: Portions released over the years (e.g., in 2006, 2011, and 2019 via FOIA) confirm investigations into these connections. For instance, at least one detainee (Paul Kurzberg) had a prior link to Mossad from work in another country, and names appeared in a CIA-FBI foreign intelligence database. The docs note polygraph tests (some failed initially but passed later), searches of their van and apartments (finding maps, cash, and film), and scrutiny of their employer, whose owner (Dominik Suter) fled to Israel shortly after. However, these same documents emphasize that no direct evidence tied them to the 9/11 plotters or advance knowledge of the specific attacks.
Broader context: Israeli intelligence (Mossad) did provide general warnings to the U.S. in August 2001 about a potential major al-Qaeda attack involving "200 terrorists" in the U.S., but these were vague and not specific to planes-as-weapons or the World Trade Center. Some reports suggest Mossad was tracking hijackers like Mohamed Atta in Florida, living near suspected Israeli "spy cells," but this is based on a 2001 French intelligence report and has never been officially confirmed as linked to the five in New Jersey.
Why This Doesn't Necessarily "Fly in the Face" of Official Conclusions
Official stance (Door #2): The FBI, 9/11 Commission, and other U.S. agencies (after 71 days of detention, interrogations, and clearances) ruled that the men had no foreknowledge or role in the attacks. They were deported solely for visa violations (working illegally on tourist visas), not terrorism charges. ABC News in 2002 quoted FBI sources saying there was "nothing" linking them to 9/11 planning, despite the Mossad surveillance angle. The logic here: If they were Mossad assets, their presence could be explained as part of routine counter-terrorism ops monitoring Arab networks—not a specific setup for 9/11. Arriving at the vantage point after the first plane hit (per timelines in FBI reports) and filming could be opportunistic "documentation" of an unfolding event they recognized as terror-related, given Israel's experience with such attacks.
The logic puzzle: You're right that Mossad ties make the "no foreknowledge" claim harder to swallow for many—especially with the ambiguous "document the event" quote, their celebratory behavior (interpreted by some as schadenfreude or "now America gets it"), and the company's front-like setup. If they were there to spy on Arabs, why film the towers so prominently? Why the high-fives? Conspiracy views see this as evidence of a deeper Israeli role (e.g., false flag or passive complicity). But officially, it's framed as coincidental: They were in the area for work/surveillance, saw the smoke, set up to record a major news event, and their reactions were misinterpreted or culturally contextual.
Unresolved ambiguities: No peer-reviewed or fully transparent evidence has overturned the official findings in 25 years. Critics argue the investigations were incomplete or influenced by U.S.-Israel alliances, but that's speculative. The 2019 FBI photo releases (showing them with NYC skyline pre-attack? Wait, no—most are post-arrest) have reignited debate, but even those docs reiterate no terrorism ties.
In short, the Mossad "revelation" (which isn't new—it's been reported since 2002) complicates the narrative but doesn't logically invalidate the official "no foreknowledge" conclusion, as the alleged spying was on general threats, not the specific 9/11 operation. If you buy the prosaic explanation, it holds; if not, it looks like a cover-up. The truth likely sits in that gray area, as with many 9/11 loose ends.

25 web pages

Israeli art students affair

Mossad warnings to CIA

⁣https://x.com/i/grok?conversat....ion=2010040887863070

⁣Dianna Ploss with Jim (Rabid Rabbi Rizoli of Temple Isra-Hell, and Joe (Minister of Hate) Rizoli, Diane (ala) King, Minister of Third Reich Advocacy.
Video: https://rumble.com/v1nuhjc-the....-4-amigos...-live-th
Audio: https://www.podomatic.com/podc....asts/joriz/episodes/
1. 8 min - Anne Frank - Something not quite right in this story ...
2. 22 min - Jeff Daugherty beliefs based NOT on the Bible but by 2 teachers he found.
3. 26 min - Uncle Murry CALL IN
4. 35 min - Discussing Christianity
5. 42 min - Was Jesus a Rabbi?
6. 47 min - What about the Protocols of Zion?
7. 53 min - Ursula Haverbeck jailed for thought crimes - prison sentence, 1 year.
8. 1 hr3 min - Alex Jones fiasco - fact or fake?
9. 1 hr 4 min - YE (Kanye West) going to the Holocaust museum?
10. 1 hr 5 min - Boston's MASTER PLAN
11. 1 hr 11 - Framingham's panhandling laws
12. 1 hr 15 min - Boston dog walker stabbed
13. 1 hr 22 min -Nick Griffin (UK) BLASTs the EU
14. 1 hr 26 min - Pfizer VAX NOT tested
15. 1 hr min - Boston Marathon bombing fraud
16. 1 hr 50 min - Joe's bus incident and why he retired after a no trespass order forced upon him
17. 2 hr 1 min - Heart issues (myocarditis especially in males 20-39) with the KILLER vaccine.
Closing Song: Hit the road (Joe), Jack
******************
JIM'S RIZOLI'S Channels
BITCHUTE - Jim Rizoli - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/kDHBE5vylTdI/
GOYIM TV - HOLOTRUTHER
https://www.goyimtv.tv/channel..../2244538652/Holotrut
WORLDTRUTH - JimRizoli -https://worldtruthvideos.website/@JimRizoli
BRIGHTEON - RizoliTV - https://www.brighteon.com/channels/jimrizoli
NEW CHANNEL - URGETUBE: https://ugetube.com/@nosixmillion
NEW CHANNEL - ODYSEE: https://odysee.com/@RizoliTV:d
Recommended Videos
**** E. Michael Jones devastates the Holocaust
https://ugetube.com/watch/conf....ronting-the-truth-ab
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/kDHBE5vylTdI/
**** Joe's BitChute videos: https://www.BitChute.com/channel/aErQDXgmf3tO/
**** Dianna Ploss Rumble videos: https://rumble.com?/user?/DiannaPloss

⁣Our new soap is here https://usecheeky.com/#starter-pack-offer
Get Goof Juice https://gamersupps.gg/?ref=moist
This is the greatest hawk tuah meltdown of All Time
Get a Starforge PC https://starforgepc.com/moist-yt
Comics https://badegg.co/

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-Iw8vmpE-A

Excerpt:

It has left investors claiming she carried out a rug pull, which is where creators of cryptocurrency sell off their stock leading to prices crashing and those who put money into it with coins worth next to nothing.

YouTube investigator Stephen 'Coffeezilla' decied to confront Welch and her team about the coin and has gone as far as to claim that they have ‘scammed’ people out of their money.

Speaking in a live stream to Welch and her team, he said: “This is one of the most miserable, horrible launches I’ve ever seen. I’ve been tracing it on the chain for a while. You guys generated over a million dollars in fees, while your fans got rug pulled. There were snipers, but there was also insider trading directly linked to y’all’s creator accounts.”

https://www.unilad.com/celebri....ty/haliey-welch-hawk

⁣9yo Lily is heading to school when she spots 4 masked men charging her. She runs back inside her house, locks the door. They kick furiously to break in. Terrified, she grabs dad's revolver: 'Leave or I'll shoot— this ain't a toy!' They laugh, keep kicking.

Terrified, she fires through door, hits one in the leg. The others flee, leaving him. He tries suing family for $50k in medical bills, claiming he was 'just knocking to sell something'—but cameras exposed the lie!

All 4 convicted of robbery, serving 3-5 yrs. Lawsuit over—no payout.

Source: https://theworldwatch.com/vide....os/1611491/brave-9yr

A pro-White music video. Love your race, love your people.

⁣https://www.flgov.com/eog/news..../press/2023/governor
May 23 2023 TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Today, Governor Ron DeSantis signed House Bill (HB) 1047 to increase criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or willfully resisting an animal working with police officers, firefighters, or search and rescue teams.

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2023/1047
CS/HB 1047: Offenses Against Certain Animals
GENERAL BILL by Judiciary Committee ; Killebrew ; Smith ; (CO-INTRODUCERS) Arrington ; Basabe ; Chaney ; Leek ; López, J. ; Massullo
Offenses Against Certain Animals; Prohibits offering or doing violence to police horse or police canine in certain circumstances; increases classification of specified criminal offenses committed against police canines, fire canines, SAR canines, or police horses.

https://odysee.com/desantis-funds-child-abuse

Video of Israeli soldiers using dogs against Palestinian boy sparks outcry

A leaked video shot in December purportedly shows IDF soldiers setting dogs on a Palestinian teenager. The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the attack, while Israel's chief military prosecutor ordered an investigation into the incident.

The video went viral after being posted to Facebook by former ultra nationalist Knesset member Michael Ben-Ari with the caption: “The soldiers taught the little terrorist a lesson.” The video has since been removed, but several copies were shared on the internet.

The Palestinian WAFA news agency reported that the attack took place on December 23, 2014 in the 'buffer zone' in the West Bank, between the town of Beit Ummar and the nearby Israeli settlement of Carmei Tzur, which is located south of the town.

The footage shows 16-year old Hamzeh Abu Hashem crying out as a dog repeatedly attacks him, while Israeli soldiers hold him down. A man can be heard commanding the dog to “bite him” as well as tauntingly asking “who’s chicken?” according to a translation provided by Haaretz.

WARNING: VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED. YOU MAY FIND THE VIDEO DISTURBING

Hashem had been accused of throwing stones at the soldiers. The IDF has said that an “internal inquiry” would be conducted and added that “the necessary steps will be taken to prevent such incidents from recurring.”

Military Advocate General Major General Danny Efroni has ordered for the soldiers involved to be interrogated, Channel 10 reported.

Hashem’s father is cited by Haaretz as saying that the teen was treated for dog bites at a hospital before being transferred to a prison.

“We, his mother and I, watched the video, and we couldn’t believe what we were seeing,” he said. “My wife almost fainted. I don’t know if there’s a mother or father in the world who can be indifferent to such pictures.

It pained us very much, especially the fact that the boy was helpless and the soldiers rejoiced over him.”

Israeli human rights group B’Tselem however says the footage doesn’t show anything out of the ordinary, noting that it is “standard” army practice. The group documented several similar incidents over last year.
Dogs are being used as weapons – activist

A projects coordinator for Breaking the Silence, a former IDF soldier leftwing organization, has condemned the attacks but confirmed that such incidents are not unusual.

“While you are a part of the army, those kind of events happen. It’s not unusual. When you use an army to control a population, when you create an occupation, that’s the kind of reality that comes out,” Achiya Schatz told RT.

He also said that he had little hope that the investigation would lead to any changes to army procedure.

“The investigations don’t lead anywhere...
https://www.rt.com/news/237397....-israel-dog-boy-atta