⁣The asthmatic looks like she barely survived

Source: https://theworldwatch.com/vide....os/1609338/2-girls-t

⁣"The 5 Dancing Israelis" - The true story of "Who committed the 9/11 attack??"

A clip recounting the episode of Israeli television on X led to an expired YouTube video titled "Dancing Israelis" - The Truth Behind 9/11’s Most Bizarre Story", which has been replaced by a very short clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lquYaVDp80k

Source: https://vk.com/video-157237914_456240420

Gemini's AI Overview:
"The 5 Dancing Israelis" refers to five Israeli men who were arrested in New Jersey on 9/11 after being seen celebrating, filming, and jumping on a van as the World Trade Center towers fell, sparking conspiracy theories about Israeli foreknowledge of the attacks, though they were later linked to the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, with their activities deemed "patsy" surveillance rather than involvement.

DOESN'T EXPLAIN AS TO HOW THEY ANTICIPATED THE ATTACK

Dancing Israelis refers to five Israeli men, Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shimuel and Omar Marmari, who were arrested on September 11th, 2001 after they were reported to be acting in a celebratory manner as the attacks took place in New York City. An FBI investigation of the five men found that two were connected to Mossad, but they were ultimately released without charge. Suspicion continued to trail the five men, and photos released by the FBI under the Freedom of Information Act several years after the attacked further fueled suspicions the men were connected to the attacks.

During the 9/11 attacks in New York City, five men were reported the police by a New York woman identified as "Maria" for appearing to be reacting the planes hitting the Twin Towers in a celebratory manner, "jumping" and "high-fiving."The men were linked to a company called "Urban Moving Systems" and were seen near a white van. The five men were detained later that day and police found "maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters, $4,700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports." Bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and reacted as if they had smelled explosives. The FBI discovered that two of the men, Sivan Kurzberg and Paul Kurzberg, were Mossad agents. The five men were ultimately released without charge, and argued their behavior was simply immature behavior.

TLDR: It is ''now'' a lost video of 5 jewish men (Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shimuel and Omar Marmari) jumping/celebrating/dancing during the 9/11 attacks. They ''just seem to be there'' while the planes were going through the towers. They were arrested but subsequently released after their Mossad ties became appearent. Now, a lot of people claimed to have seen the footage of dancing israelis. Probably through amateur recording or even cctv. It was on youtube but ultimately was taken down shortly after.


https://thegrayzone.com/2021/0....9/11/dancing-israeli

https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1

https://archive.org/details/youtube-FuQz6ej7hT4

https://www.haaretz.com/2001-0....9-17/ty-article/5-is

https://www.heraldscotland.com..../news/12768362.five-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98u5K448WQc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3t9pkF31wo

https://www.reddit.com/r/lostm....edia/comments/vjmvzg

Interaction with GROK:

⁣https://x.com/ounkaonx/status/....2009577930847145986?

The post references a real 2001 incident where five Israeli nationals, employed by a moving company, were arrested in New Jersey on September 11 after witnesses reported them filming the World Trade Center attacks from a rooftop and appearing celebratory; FBI investigations found no evidence of foreknowledge or involvement in the plot, leading to their deportation after 71 days.
In a November 2001 Israeli TV interview featured in the post's video, one detainee stated their "purpose was to document the event," which he clarified as reacting to the unfolding attacks from a terror-experienced perspective, though the phrasing has fueled decades of conspiracy theories about Mossad ties, as detailed in declassified FBI reports and ABC News coverage.
Posted on January 9, 2026, amid resurgent online discussions of 9/11 anomalies, the thread's 132 replies largely echo skepticism about official narratives, highlighting how such claims persist due to ambiguous wording and unproven intelligence links, without peer-reviewed evidence supporting advance knowledge.

How does one document an event that one purportedly hasn't have any knowledge of previously?

Searching the web
31 results
The famous (and frequently quoted) phrase "Our purpose was to document the event" comes from an Israeli television interview given by one of the five detained men (most sources attribute it to Oded Ellner) shortly after their deportation back to Israel in late 2001.The sentence is almost always presented in English as a standalone bombshell implying foreknowledge — the core puzzle you're pointing at: How do you plan to "document" something you claim you had no advance knowledge of?Two main interpretations exist
The conspiracy reading (very popular online)
The phrasing is taken literally and prospectively: they went there with the premeditated intention of documenting this specific event before it began → therefore they must have known it was coming → therefore foreknowledge (and often implied involvement).
This view treats the sentence as a Freudian slip or careless admission.
The prosaic / retrospective reading (supported by official investigations and some contextual translations)
The men are explaining, after the fact, why they started filming once the attacks were already underway.
The full quote in many sources is embedded in a longer statement something like:
"The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
In this context, "our purpose" refers to their immediate motivation once the first plane hit and the disaster was visibly unfolding: as Israelis accustomed to terror attacks back home, they instinctively grabbed cameras to record what was clearly a major historic/terror event — not that they set out that morning planning to film a specific attack on the World Trade Center.In everyday English (and even more so in translated Hebrew → English), people often use "was" in retrospective explanations this way:
"I went to the window to see what was happening" (said after the fact)
"We rushed there to help the victims" (explaining motivation during/after an unfolding event)
The phrasing sounds awkward or suspicious in English precisely because it's a direct (and not particularly polished) translation from Hebrew, delivered in a casual TV interview setting.
What the investigations concludedMultiple U.S. agencies (FBI, 9/11 Commission reporting, etc.) looked into the incident extensively:
The men arrived at the Doric Towers vantage point after the first plane hit (eyewitness timing varies, but most place it post-impact)
They were detained, questioned at length, polygraphed, and investigated for weeks
FBI ultimately concluded they had no foreknowledge of the attacks and no involvement in planning or executing them
They were deported for visa violations (working illegally on tourist visas), not terrorism charges
The "dancing" / celebratory behavior reported by one eyewitness (high-fives, appearing happy) was never fully reconciled — some accounts say it looked like joy at the attack itself, while defenders argue it could have been relief/shock/excitement that "the Americans will finally understand what Israel deals with" — but it was never legally tied to advance knowledge.Bottom lineYou can't logically plan to document a specific surprise attack you have no knowledge of.
The two possibilities are therefore:
They did have foreknowledge → and the sentence is a genuine (if clumsy) admission
They didn't → and the sentence is simply a poorly worded, retrospective explanation of why they filmed an enormous, once-in-a-generation terror attack once it had already started
Official U.S. investigations landed on door #2.
The sentence continues to fuel debate mostly because of its inherently ambiguous phrasing in translation + the emotionally charged context of 9/11.

31 web pages

Full transcript of Ellner interview

Mossad's US operations history

How does one document an event that one purportedly hasn't have any knowledge of previously?

Searching the web
29 results
The short, honest answer to your question is: You can't — at least not in the prospective, premeditated sense that the phrase most naturally suggests in English when taken out of context.If someone truly had zero prior knowledge of a specific surprise event, they could not have set out that morning with the deliberate purpose of documenting that exact event. The logic is airtight, and this is precisely why the sentence "Our purpose was to document the event" (spoken by Oded Ellner on Israeli television shortly after their return home) has remained one of the most quoted and debated lines in all of 9/11 discussion for over two decades.Two competing explanations people actually give
The "slip / admission" interpretation (dominant in skeptical / alternative communities)
The statement is taken at face value: they went there intending to document this specific attack → therefore they (or someone directing them) must have known in advance.
This reading treats the phrasing as either:
a careless admission of foreknowledge, or
confirmation they were on some kind of surveillance/documentary assignment that anticipated a major event.
Supporters usually point out that the grammar sounds prospective ("purpose was to document" = the intention they had before it started), and they combine it with other disputed details (timing of arrival, reported behavior, camera setup, etc.).
The "awkward retrospective explanation" interpretation (official investigations + some defenders)
The men are speaking after the fact, in a casual TV interview, trying to explain their motivation once the attack became visible.
The fuller context usually given is something close to:
"The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."
In this reading, "purpose" refers to their immediate reaction after the first plane hit:
They saw a massive, historic terror attack unfolding (something they claim felt familiar from experience in Israel).
They instinctively decided "this needs to be documented" → grabbed a camera → filmed.
In casual, translated speech, people frequently describe motivations this way in hindsight:
"We ran over to help the injured" (said after the emergency is over)
"I turned on the camera to capture what was happening"
The English translation from Hebrew sounds stilted and suspicious because:
It's a direct, not-very-polished translation.
Hebrew-to-English tense/motivation phrasing often feels off in exactly this way.
The speaker was young, not a native English speaker, and probably not thinking about how the line would be dissected for 25 years.
What actually happened according to investigationsThe FBI's multi-month investigation (multiple declassified sections released over the years) concluded:
No evidence the five men had foreknowledge of the attacks.
No evidence of involvement in planning or execution.
They were deported for immigration violations (working illegally), not terrorism-related charges.
At least two had loose prior connections to Israeli intelligence (not unusual for young Israeli men who do mandatory service), but nothing tied to 9/11 advance knowledge.
The phrase continues to be radioactive because it is genuinely ambiguous in English — especially when quoted alone without the "terror daily" preface — and because the whole incident (behavior reports, company owner fleeing, etc.) already felt strange to many people.In the end, you either accept that it's a clumsy, post-facto wording by non-native speakers… or you don't. There's no third logically clean option. The sentence simply doesn't sit comfortably either way — which is exactly why it refuses to die.

29 web pages

Full transcript of Ellner's interview

Other 9/11 foreknowledge claims

You said earlier that "Official U.S. investigations landed on door #2." - doesn't that fly in the face of logic once it was revealed that they were Mossad assets?

Searching the web
22 results

Browsing web page
2 results
The reports of Mossad connections to at least some of the five Israelis (often called the "Dancing Israelis") do add a layer of intrigue, but they don't inherently contradict the official U.S. investigations' conclusions of no foreknowledge or involvement in 9/11—though they certainly fuel skepticism and alternative interpretations. Let's break this down based on what's been reported over the years, drawing from declassified documents, media investigations, and official statements.The Reported Mossad Ties
Key claims from media and leaks: A 2002 article in The Forward (a respected Jewish-American publication) cited a U.S. official briefed on the case, who stated that the FBI assessed Urban Moving Systems (the men's employer) as a "front for the Mossad" and that at least two of the detainees were Mossad operatives. Their alleged mission: surveilling Arab communities in the U.S., particularly those with potential ties to radical groups. This aligns with broader reports of Israeli intelligence operations in the U.S. around that time, including the "Israeli art students" affair, where dozens of young Israelis (some with military/intelligence backgrounds) were detained for suspicious activities near federal buildings and later deported.
Declassified FBI documents: Portions released over the years (e.g., in 2006, 2011, and 2019 via FOIA) confirm investigations into these connections. For instance, at least one detainee (Paul Kurzberg) had a prior link to Mossad from work in another country, and names appeared in a CIA-FBI foreign intelligence database. The docs note polygraph tests (some failed initially but passed later), searches of their van and apartments (finding maps, cash, and film), and scrutiny of their employer, whose owner (Dominik Suter) fled to Israel shortly after. However, these same documents emphasize that no direct evidence tied them to the 9/11 plotters or advance knowledge of the specific attacks.
Broader context: Israeli intelligence (Mossad) did provide general warnings to the U.S. in August 2001 about a potential major al-Qaeda attack involving "200 terrorists" in the U.S., but these were vague and not specific to planes-as-weapons or the World Trade Center. Some reports suggest Mossad was tracking hijackers like Mohamed Atta in Florida, living near suspected Israeli "spy cells," but this is based on a 2001 French intelligence report and has never been officially confirmed as linked to the five in New Jersey.
Why This Doesn't Necessarily "Fly in the Face" of Official Conclusions
Official stance (Door #2): The FBI, 9/11 Commission, and other U.S. agencies (after 71 days of detention, interrogations, and clearances) ruled that the men had no foreknowledge or role in the attacks. They were deported solely for visa violations (working illegally on tourist visas), not terrorism charges. ABC News in 2002 quoted FBI sources saying there was "nothing" linking them to 9/11 planning, despite the Mossad surveillance angle. The logic here: If they were Mossad assets, their presence could be explained as part of routine counter-terrorism ops monitoring Arab networks—not a specific setup for 9/11. Arriving at the vantage point after the first plane hit (per timelines in FBI reports) and filming could be opportunistic "documentation" of an unfolding event they recognized as terror-related, given Israel's experience with such attacks.
The logic puzzle: You're right that Mossad ties make the "no foreknowledge" claim harder to swallow for many—especially with the ambiguous "document the event" quote, their celebratory behavior (interpreted by some as schadenfreude or "now America gets it"), and the company's front-like setup. If they were there to spy on Arabs, why film the towers so prominently? Why the high-fives? Conspiracy views see this as evidence of a deeper Israeli role (e.g., false flag or passive complicity). But officially, it's framed as coincidental: They were in the area for work/surveillance, saw the smoke, set up to record a major news event, and their reactions were misinterpreted or culturally contextual.
Unresolved ambiguities: No peer-reviewed or fully transparent evidence has overturned the official findings in 25 years. Critics argue the investigations were incomplete or influenced by U.S.-Israel alliances, but that's speculative. The 2019 FBI photo releases (showing them with NYC skyline pre-attack? Wait, no—most are post-arrest) have reignited debate, but even those docs reiterate no terrorism ties.
In short, the Mossad "revelation" (which isn't new—it's been reported since 2002) complicates the narrative but doesn't logically invalidate the official "no foreknowledge" conclusion, as the alleged spying was on general threats, not the specific 9/11 operation. If you buy the prosaic explanation, it holds; if not, it looks like a cover-up. The truth likely sits in that gray area, as with many 9/11 loose ends.

25 web pages

Israeli art students affair

Mossad warnings to CIA

⁣https://x.com/i/grok?conversat....ion=2010040887863070

⁣Dive into exclusive body cam footage from the search warrant at Quality Inn Room 110 in Silverdale, captured right after Houston Wade's high-profile arrest in a December 2025 undercover operation. Watch as law enforcement uncovers key items during the room sweep, offering a raw look at the investigation's progression in this developing case.

Stay updated on Houston Wade news, Kitsap County court updates, and true crime stories. If you enjoyed this breakdown, like, subscribe, and hit the bell for notifications on more investigative content!

Body Camera from Search Warrant at Quality Inn Silverdale, Washington after arrest of YouTuber Houston Wade on December 17, 2025

#houstonwade #bodycam #bodycamera #searchwarrant #truecrimecommunity

Body Camera from Search Warrant at Quality Inn Silverdale, Washington after arrest of YouTuber Houston Wade on December 17, 2025

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FASJ3l5XOXg

⁣*Disclaimer:* The opinions and views expressed in this video are solely those of the creator and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any affiliated organizations, employers, or groups. This content is for informational/entertainment purposes only and does not constitute professional advice (medical, legal, financial, etc.). Users engage with this content at their own risk.

In this video we watch the body cam footage of the ICE officer who shot Renee Good after she attempted to run him over. We also see how this behavior is organized and trained by a group called ICE WATCH which she was apart of.

There seem to be calls to protest over this situation which is completely unnecessary.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4Fgz-GiAlc

⁣Minneapolis ICE protest agitator ADMITS to Laura Ingraham that they are in fact, PAID. These events are NOT ORGANIC whatsoever.

Stop being played by the mainstream media and the people who are literally robbing you blind.

Source: https://x.com/TheSCIF/status/2009569459694928169

⁣The Epstein before Epstein and North Fox Island.

A wealthy elite named Francis Shelden would take unfortunate youth to an island with other elites called North Fox Island to abuse and film them.

Shelden came from a very wealthy background and many elites would visit the island to specifically to sexually abuse children. How big was this elite circle of child predators?

North Fox Island, just off the coast of Michigan, was a small, private island, that was filled with lodges or "cabins" with movie production type of equipment and many dark types of movies were alleged to be made, which included the sexual abuse of children, blackmailing elites, and snuff films.

There is also an infamous murder case that has deep parallels to this case were tons of children were being found dead who were sexually abused and left on roadsides all around the area.

Sheldon was eventually caught in 1978, he fled to the Netherlands to avoid prosecution. Another individual who was a teacher was also caught and charged who has now passed away.

This is around the same time that Jeffery Epstein came out of nowhere and basically took Francis Sheldon's spot, whether he was connected or not. Epstein rubbed shoulders with all the elite.

Nobody knew where Epstein came from, how he had his connections, or where his money came from.

There are more Epsteins and more islands with the same kind of dark happenings to this day. Some have been shut down already, and others are still operating.

One thing is for sure. It has ALWAYS been about the children, and it's time we shut these trafficking and blackmail operations down.

Link to the FBI Francis D. Shelden case files:
https://vault.fbi.gov/francis-shelden

Source: https://x.com/TheSCIF/status/2008996765228261849

⁣BREAKING: Two people in Portland, Oregon, have been shot by Border Patrol after they allegedly almost ran agent(s) over with their vehicle.

FBI Statement: “FBI Portland is investigating an agent involved shooting that happened at approximately 2:15pm near the 10000 block of Main St. in Portland involving Customs and Border Patrol Agents in which 2 individuals were wounded. This remains and active and ongoing investigation led by the FBI. Please follow this thread for updates regarding this matter.”

Credit: @EricLDaugh

Source: https://x.com/RedWave_Press/st....atus/200941528542677

BONUS: Taintless Timmie finally finds a decent take:

Tim Pool presents slowed-down footage “proving” the 37-year-old woman shot by ICE intended to “kill that ICE agent.”

“Watch the officer who has his gun drawn… You see his foot sliding? Yeah. He’s not taking a step. He’s being hit by the vehicle.”

“Were it not for the ice, which you can see on the ground, the vehicle would have just lurched forward and run this guy over.”

@Timcast

https://x.com/VigilantFox/stat....us/20093107868337729

⁣Thanks for watching!

Please subscribe to our channel, give this video a like, and leave a comment. Your support truly makes me happy and inspires me to create new content.

We are constantly looking for new authors to join our team. All of our writing is created by real people—no AI-generated scripts. We focus on producing high-quality content and welcome creators who want to be part of that mission. If you are interested, send us a message at hr@paradoxunion.com.

If you believe this video infringes on any copyrights, please email me at sales@paradoxunion.com, and I will remove it promptly. Please do not issue a copyright strike.

*This video is completely made by us: KARMALAND

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAygsyaUsrA

⁣Erika Kirk forgot to delete this when she was deleting her past! We might have canceled the live but well the juice is juicey tonight... Whoever Erika Kirk hired to clean her party NY past and ties to her cousin Nicole Rothstei** you might want to fire that person because oops you missed deleting your highlights!!! Oh the PR nightmare and crisis you guys all are Mrs., CEO OF TPUSA....

Let me know what you think in the comments. Please like and share the video and if you like my content subscribe to the channel it's free and helps my channel grow! Thank you for all your support!

#charliekirk #charliekirkinvestigation #erikakirk #trending #tpusa #turningpointusa #fypシ #fyp #fypyoutube #fypage #foryou #foryouシ #foryoutube #foryoupage #news #podcast #patriotichousewife

Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing

DISCLAIMER: This content is for educational, documentary and entertainment purposes only. Based on actual events. The authoritative sources used for this story include interviews, newspaper articles, and TV news reporting meant to educate and memorialize notable cases in our history.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tX4fOwIKDmg

⁣Israel Caught Blackmailing Dan Bongino To Censor Independent Media

Dan Bongino has declared his number one enemy are so-called "conspiracy theorists" across social media. Not because they're wrong, but because they're asking the questions he doesn't want asked.

It's not going to go well for Dan, trust me. Especially given what's in his closet.

Source: https://x.com/tpvsean/status/2008936006599188606

Epic kvetching from John Angelo 'Lucas' Gage and NNR

⁣Minnesota ICE shooting live updates: Driver fatally shot by immigration agent

The Department of Homeland Security said the woman had weaponized her vehicle, but the Minneapolis mayor said video of the incident did not show that.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/u....s-news/live-blog/min

A slowed down version of the liberal terrorlst trying to run over an ICE agent has been released..

Spread this everywhere!!

Source: https://x.com/iAnonPatriot/sta....tus/2008985515832561

Thumbnail: https://x.com/Ca30199057Chris/....status/2008981447709

What we know about the incident

A 37-year-old woman was fatally shot by an ICE agent today after a group of people began blocking officers during an immigration-related operation in Minneapolis, the Department of Homeland Security said.

Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin alleged that the driver "weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them."

In a news conference, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said it did not appear from video of the incident that the vehicle was being weaponized against the agent. He called for ICE to leave the city, saying the agency is “causing chaos and distrust.”

Video footage from NBC affiliate KARE 11 of Minneapolis showed a burgundy SUV with what appears to be a bullet hole in the windshield. It’s not clear to whom the SUV belongs or from where the bullet was shot.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz pushed back on Homeland Security's account of the shooting, saying he has "seen the video." "Don’t believe this propaganda machine," he added.

⁣🚨 HOLY SH*T! CANDACE OWENS JUST SHATTERED THE FBI’S CHARLIE KIRK STORY

She just released a never-before-seen still image showing Charlie Kirk from behind at the exact moment he was shot - no blood, no exit wound, no visible injury.

Remember when that certain TPUSA employee climbed on Charlie's chair, removed the camera, and took the SD card? This is the footage from that camera and that memory card.

If this is the real frame from the scene… what exactly are they covering up?

Source: https://x.com/HustleBitch_/sta....tus/2008695985808326

Thumbnail: https://imgflip.com/i/agqc4f [thanks to https://x.com/TheSCIF/status/2008680422704615540 🖲]

NEW images courtesy of Candace Owens shows no blood or exit wound from the camera behind Charlie Kirk on the day of his assassination.

The "cord" is his necklace, and the only visible blood is in his hand by his microphone.

This does not demonstrate the damage a .30-06 caliber round would cause 99% of the time, especially on such a thin, weak, part of the human body.

More questions than answers.

⁣The story you think you know about Dorothy and her ruby slippers is a lie.
Hollywood changed one crucial detail when they made the 1939 movie. One detail so dangerous they had to bury it.

In the original book, Dorothy's slippers weren't ruby. They were silver. Those silver slippers held a secret message about the greatest financial conspiracy of the 1890s. A coded warning about corrupt bankers, fraudulent politicians, and a rigged system designed to crush ordinary Americans.

L. Frank Baum hid this message in a children's story, knowing it was the only way it would survive. He embedded clues in every character, every road, every piece of magic. Once you know what to look for, everything about this beloved tale transforms into something far darker, and far more dangerous, than you ever imagined.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMD1-VVUO1g

⁣This video is now illegal in IsraeI.

If you share this video you could be sent to prison for 5 years...

Source: https://x.com/Nadira_ali12/sta....tus/2008184211598151

Thumbnail: https://x.com/Andromeda11711/s....tatus/18983604070411

Former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has confirmed that Israel implemented the controversial "Hannibal Directive" during the October 7 Hamas attacks, marking the first official acknowledgment. The directive, which allows military action to prevent captives from being taken—even at the risk of their lives—was reportedly used in specific areas but inconsistently applied. Investigations have revealed that some Israeli hostages were killed by friendly fire, sparking criticism over military decision-making. The revelation adds to the controversy surrounding Israel’s handling of hostages and the wider security response.

'Hannibal Directive': Israel Confirms IDF Killed Own Citizens During Hamas' October 7 Attack
https://youtu.be/FTQez9YhcLk?si=ohJiLoyeooVvL-lv
——-—

October 7th wasn’t some one off terrorist act based on lies… The same bullshit has been ongoing for 8 decades now. this they do via deceptions and propaganda for fake news which nitwits like Jeff Brown actually believes and runs with, despite Israel’s Hannibal Directive being common knowledge.

The proof? See US ALWAYS PRESENT & ISRAEL ALWAYS ABSENT LINK BELOW.

U. S. Wars & Hostile Actions: A List

There is a reason that most countries polled in December 2013 by Gallup called the United States the greatest threat to peace in the world, and why Pew found that viewpoint increased in 2017.

But it is a reason that eludes that strain of U.S. academia that first defines war as something that nations and groups other than the United States do, and then concludes that war has nearly vanished from the earth.

Since World War II, during a supposed golden age of peace, the United States military has killed or helped kill some 20 million people, overthrown at least 36 governments, interfered in at least 86 foreign elections, attempted to assassinate over 50 foreign leaders, and dropped bombs on people in over 30 countries. The United States is responsible for the deaths of 5 million people in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, and over 1 million just since 2003 in Iraq.

Since 2001, the United States has been systematically destroying a region of the globe, bombing Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, and Syria, not to mention the Philippines. The United States has “special forces” operating in two-thirds of the world’s countries and non-special forces in three-quarters of them.

See also How Many Millions Have Been Killed in America’s Post-9/11 Wars? Part 3: Libya, Syria, Somalia and Yemen by Nicolas Davies From 2018, this article estimates 5 to 7 million people directly killed by U.S. wars since 2001 in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia and Yemen.

See also How Death Outlives War by Costs of War. From 2023, this report estimates 4.5 to 4.6 million people killed directly or indirectly by U.S. wars since 2001 in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, and Yemen.

The U.S. government provides weapons, military training, and/or military funding to almost every dictatorship and oppressive government on earth.

See my 2020 book 20 Dictators Currently Supported by the U.S. ...

https://davidswanson.org/warlist/

Info Sourced from Telegram

⁣PeachProof - And...lights out‼ 😵

Source: https://x.com/PeachProof23/sta....tus/2008444381523833

⁣This Morbid Monday was sparked by a photo connected to the Jeffrey Epstein case that was recently released and immediately sparked a lot of questions. People started asking the same thing over and over.... is this what they think it is, or is something else going on here?

When images involving death start circulating online, I tend to get tagged aka "summoned". And honestly, my morbid little heart loves that people think of me when they want someone to weigh in through death science instead of panic.

So… here goes nothing.

This episode isn’t about rehashing the Epstein case or chasing theories. It’s about how death is documented, how the human body actually behaves after death, and why certain images raise more questions than they answer.

Along the way, I also share personal experience from inside a correctional facility on a death call — because understanding how tightly controlled and documented those environments are matters when we talk about what should exist versus what we’re shown.

I’m a mortician. I’ve stood in rooms where deaths are documented down to the minute. I’ve seen what gets photographed, what gets preserved, and what gets questioned later... and I believe that perspective matters here. I hope you do too!

Topics include mortuary science, post-death changes, and why some high-profile deaths never feel fully settled for EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. Disclaimer: I do show a photo of the Jeff man SLEEPING there peacefully on that metal table, please don't be upset magical youtube person who will inevitably see this video. He's just resting his eyes I SWEAR.

If this kind of death-science deep dive is your thing, don't forget to like and subscribe! We do Morbid Mondays every Monday and I'd love to have you back next week!

#mortician #educational #funeralservice #mortuaryscience #coroner #epsteinfiles #deathscience #laurenthemortician #prison #storytime source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9exzWqnuPmg

⁣Did you know? 🤯

A zero-point energy device is now on the market ⚡🔌

Unlimited power — an idea envisioned long ago.

Free energy may no longer be theory.

Source: https://x.com/vegastarr/status/2008373833422827870

⁣Exact 7 year delta. Q proof.

The fact that DJT posts this exact contentent... from the exact same day, 7 years ago.... should tell you all you need to know.

Great catch @NewsBlast17

Source: https://x.com/RamboAndFrens/st....atus/200824246845461

Thumbnail: https://x.com/NewsBlast17/stat....us/20080900480472475

DO YOU BELIEVE IN COINCIDENCE?

[7] year delta between Q, and Trump, exactly to the date.

Same day, same content.

January 5th, 2019 - Q posts a link to a 5:48 length video called, "This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected"

January 5th, 2026 - Trump posts the exact same video

https://investigatej6.org/

⁣I’m 💯 with this man😎😎

Source: https://x.com/TylerRatcliff17/....status/2008100213240

Call 811 Before You Dig

Calling 811 or visiting www.call811.com has proven to be the foremost preventive measure in excavation safety and damage prevention. Research has revealed that if someone calls 8-1-1 before they dig, they have a 99 percent chance of avoiding an incident, injury, harm to the environment and even death.

https://www.transportation.gov..../content/call-811-yo