Live streaming on Altcast.TV is now available!
News & Politics
Washingtons ghost - Speeding off from a traffic stop with a 6 year old in the front seat and a cop clinging to the door probably isn’t the best idea
Source: https://x.com/hartgoat/status/1811504088086942112
Thumbnail: https://steemit.com/memechalle....nge/@hippie-witha-gu
PhotographicFloridian - Confirmed in Hollywood
Source: https://x.com/jacklinfll/statu....s/181138861845744869
South Florida policewomen look exactly how you’d want South Florida policewomen to look.
/cc @flapprdotnet
https://x.com/AmyA1A/status/1811440600798912661
Danielly De andrade
I’m wife, Mom, Police detective and love to workout and encourage my fellow coworkers and followers.
Placed 24th
in their group
We would like to thank you for supporting Danielly De andrade in this year's competition. Your participation allows us to aid Be Positive Foundation's mission to provide financial assistance to families, fund childhood cancer research, and bring awareness to the fight against childhood cancer.
https://mshealthandfit.com/202....4/danielly-de-andrad
Congresswoman Maxine Waters, 85, Adjusts Wig Live on CNN While Discussing 2024 Election in Viral Moment: 'She's Real for This'
House Democrat Maxine Waters, 85, appeared to be having a frustrating issue with her wig during a recent sit-down with CNN.
Despite being on live television, the California representative was seen adjusting her hair for roughly 30 seconds as she was asked about the 2024 election and how to keep Donald Trump from from winning a second term in the White House.
"They've heard these arguments about democracy, about the fate of the election and yet, Trump is not only winning but ... increasingly, by a larger margin. So what is the plan among Democrats to change that trajectory?"
Waters quickly stopped fixing her hair and smoothly responded, "I think we need to keep working."
One X user in the comments section of the viral video quipped, "85-year-old Maxine Waters losing a battle with her wig live on CNN." Another person teased, "Congresswoman Maxine Waters said it may be 10 pm but I still need to look good "
A third person replied, "Honestly, I get it. She’s real for this."
Others suggested that Waters simply did not realize she was visible on a split screen and thought that the camera would cut to her when it was time to answer her question.
Source: https://vidmax.com/video/22844....3-it-looks-like-mad-
Thumbnail: https://okmagazine.com/p/maxin....e-waters-85-adjusts-
‘Bad hair day’: Sky News host reacts to US Democrat having ‘difficulties with her wig’
Sky News host Danica De Giorgio reacts to footage of a US Democrat experiencing “technical difficulties with her wig” live on air.
“Safe to say we’ve all had bad hair days,” Ms De Giorgio said.
“But Democratic representative Maxine Waters had hers live on air when she had some technical difficulties with her wig.
“Watching Maxine desperately try and fix that Yorkshire Terrier on top of her head has truly been the highlight of the Democrat campaign so far – pity though the wig is about as useless as Joe Biden.”
https://www.skynews.com.au/opi....nion/bad-hair-day-sk
Cancer Surgeon: “Ivermectin Is SAFER Than a Sugar Pill”
“You’d have to take a lot to make yourself sick.”
Dr. Kathleen Ruddy has also observed multiple late-stage cancer patients make dramatic recoveries after taking ivermectin.
Ivermectin is also:
• A Nobel Prize-winning discovery (2015)
• Recognized, 2nd to penicillin, for having the greatest impact on human health
• Credited for bringing river blindness to the brink of elimination
• Used globally in HUMANS, with over 3.7 billion doses admi
Source: https://www.facebook.com/reel/722915173237939
Thumbnail: https://images.app.goo.gl/dx1vF7fUDovDyAVt6
AltCastTV & Odysee thumbnail: http://www.crawfishboxes.com/2....012/10/24/3548014/th
Boxer Ryan Garcia was banned from boxing after spewing a racist rant on social media. Dr. Rashad Richey and Tehran Von Ghasri discuss on Indisputable. Tell us what you think in the comments below.
Read more here: https://atlantablackstar.com/2....024/07/09/ryan-garci
"Boxer Ryan Garcia has come under fire over using racial slurs and ill remarks about George Floyd during a recent social media rant, prompting former NBA player and friend of Floyd Stephen Jackson to take issue with his words.
On Thursday, July 4, Ryan Garcia embarked on a rampage on Twitter Spaces in which he used the N-word several times and proclaimed that he hates Black people and Muslims.
“I hate n—gers, I’m anti-Black. Let’s join the Ku Klux Klan. F—k the n—gers! N—a, I’m KKK,” Garcia said."
***
Indisputable, features Dr. Richey talking about the top news stories of the day, reading viewer comments, and engaging in debates and conversations with guests.
Help support our mission and get perks. Membership protects TYT's independence from corporate ownership and allows us to provide free live shows that speak truth to power for people around the world. See Perks: ▶ https://www.youtube.com/TheYoungTurks/join
"TYT’s Indisputable with Dr. Rashad Richey has achieved 1 million podcast downloads, putting the show in the top 5% of all podcasts. This comes after The Hicks Evaluation Group recognized Indisputable as “America’s Fastest Growing Television News Show.”
Every weekday, Dr. Richey covers stories about criminal justice, politics, social justice, and policy. Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA) credited Dr. Richey’s journalism as, “Fulfilling public obligation to bring fa....cts into public ligh
SUBSCRIBE on YOUTUBE: ☞ http://www.youtube.com/IndisputableTYT
FACEBOOK: ☞ http://www.facebook.com/IndisputableTYT
TWITTER: ☞ http://www.twitter.com/IndisputableTYT
INSTAGRAM: ☞ http://www.instagram.com/IndisputableTYT
TWITCH: ☞ http://www.twitch.com/tyt
? Merch: http://shoptyt.com
❤ Donate: http://www.tyt.com/go
? Website: https://www.tyt.com
?App: http://www.tyt.com/app
? Newsletters: https://www.tyt.com/newsletters/
If you want to watch more videos from TYT, consider subscribing to other channels in our network:
The Young Turks ▶ https://www.youtube.com/theyoungturks
The Damage Report ▶ https://www.youtube.com/thedamagereport
TYT Sports ▶ https://www.youtube.com/tytsports
The Conversation ▶ https://www.youtube.com/tytconversation
Rebel HQ ▶ https://www.youtube.com/rebelhq
TYT Investigates ▶ https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCwNJt9PYyN1uyw2Xh
#tyt #indisputabletyt #news
240710__id06boxer
source: https://youtu.be/FbuCbt6iI3o
Border authorities are warning that cartels are using a new tactic of using charter buses — like those used for vacation tours — to transport migrants who illegally entered the U.S. Smugglers are banking on lax inspections of the buses at border checkpoints.
#immigration #borderreport #border
"NewsNation Now" is a no fluff, no filler newscast hosted by Nichole Berlie and Connell McShane featuring up-to-the-minute news drawing from a network of journalists across the U.S. Weekdays starting at 1p/12C.
NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
More from NewsNation: https://www.newsnationnow.com/
Get our app: https://trib.al/TBXgYpp
Find us on cable: https://trib.al/YDOpGyG
How to watch on TV or streaming: https://trib.al/Vu0Ikij
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-Ty4YKOaFU
YOU created this golem; now you get to see it in one of your propaganda museums, bubbeleh! 😅
Dov Hikind reacts to a Florida Holocaust museum's decision to hold a memorial for George Floyd - via Newsmax TV's 'National Report.'
Watch Newsmax TV on Directv 349, Xfinity 1115, Dish 216, Spectrum (see channels), Cox, Optimum, U-Verse 1120, FiOS 615, Suddenlink, CenturyLink 1209, Mediacom 277, Fubo, Sling, WOW!, Armstrong, YouTube live stream, or the Newsmax smartphone APP. Find your cable/streaming provider here: http://nws.mx/tv
Stay up-to-date at https://www.newsmax.com/
Like Newsmax on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/newsmax/
Follow Newsmax on Twitter: https://twitter.com/newsmax
Follow Newsmax on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/newsmax/
Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj6s6wF03B0
Email Signup Just in Case
https://www.sustainableseasons.com/
Follow me on Twitter X Just in Case
https://twitter.com/PatrickHumphre
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCEb2N54-fMYvtCs2i
US Air Force insider and former environmental engineering Kristen Meghan is blowing the whistle on geoengineering programs inside of the USA. Cloud seeding and stratospheric aerosol injection are discussed along with weather modification programs & weather manipulation in the US military. Watch Patrick Humphrey prepper news updates. Get prepared now for shtf 2024.
“Stand firm, and you will win life.” Luke 21:19
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC5zSO4AUA
Y-WE-SAY posted [from BitChute]:
Is there anyone in the NAVY that can confirm this????
: DOWNLOAD-TREATY: HERE: https://www.LASTFLAGSTANDING.COM
: Russell-Jay: Gould.
: TRUTH-WINS.
: PLEASE-SHARE AND SPREAD-TRUTH:
[MANY LINKS GET BLOCKED SO WE CREATE NEW ONES]
: http://linktr.ee/russelljaygould
: HTTPS://FORTHECLAIMOFTHELIFE.COM.
: HTTPS://PIERCING-DYNASTY.COM.
: HTTPS://QUANTUM-GRAMMAR.COM.
: HTTPS://RUSSELLJAYGOULD.COM.
: https://www.LastFlagStanding.com .
: HISTORY'S-BEEN-A-LIE.
[ Last-Flag-Standing
Witness for the Win
Russell Jay Gould
Freedom Fighter
Fake history
Fake elections
Fake news
Truth
Reality
Courage
2020 elections
War Castles
Crypto
Quantum-Banking ]
Source: https://youtu.be/nViO_AElqdY?si=V66MWO2rZOib2qKL
VfB cuts to the quick: had he NOT aimed the gun, Hayla Hutchins would NOT be dead - period ✅
Of course, this will serve as a distraction from the much more important issues of the time...but that's how the multi pronged attack works
This line is a keeper: 'Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the movie set weapons handler who loaded a gun for actor Alec Baldwin before it fired and killed a cinematographer'
w e w 😅
Never-before-seen footage from the set of ‘Rust’ taken days before the fatal shooting of Halyna Hutchins was exclusively obtained by NBC News. The video shows Alec Baldwin preparing for scenes, firing weapons and interacting with crew members. NBC News’ Chloe Melas reports.
The videos are among dozens that special prosecutors requested from Rust Movie Productions LLC in the spring and didn’t receive until October, according to a source familiar with the matter. NBC News hasn’t reviewed the rest of the videos.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrKs7eabb2w
Thumbnail: https://images.app.goo.gl/2m586yWXRddrgf3FA
AltCastTV & Odysee thumbnail: https://www.primogif.com/p/26DMVEZN2uGigLQmk
https://www.koat.com/article/a....lec-baldwin-trial-ne
https://forward.com/news/53442....0/alec-baldwin-court
LGBTQ activists speak out against SB1414, a California bill which would make it a felony to purchase children for s*x. They claim it will affect LGBTQ people more....
When they tell you who they are, believe them...
Source: https://gab.com/White__Rabbit/....posts/11275707025192
Thumbnail: https://canadafreepress.com/ar....ticle/lgbtq-activist
Sen. Grove‘s Measure to Make Purchasing a Child for Sex a Felony, Rejected by Senate Public Safety Committee
Today, the Senate Public Safety Committee forced hostile amendments on Senator Shannon Grove and passed her bill, Senate Bill 1414 (SB 1414) out of committee without her consent.
Senator Grove presented SB 1414 which seeks to strengthen protections for minor victims by making the act of soliciting, agreeing to engage in or engaging in any form of commercial sex with a child a felony offense, with sex offender registry required on repeat offenses. SB 1414 is a bipartisan measure, joint authored by Senator Anna Caballero (D-Merced) and Senator Susan Rubio (D-Baldwin Park), and co-sponsored by Love Never Fails and 3Strands Global Foundation.
Instead of voting on Senator Grove’s bill as proposed, members of the committee instead forced hostile amendments and voted the bill out of committee without Senator Grove’s consent. Now, instead of making the purchase of all children a felony, the committee has made the solicitation or purchase of children for sex punishable by a wobbler, which can still be charged as a misdemeanor, punishable by as little as 2 days in jail or up to a $10,000 fine.
A felony can only be charged if the child solicited or purchased was 15 years old or younger, and unfortunately, the buyer would still be ineligible for prison. If a buyer has a previous conviction of purchasing a child under 16 years old and is convicted on a second offense of buying child under 16 years old and the victim and buyer are more than 10 years apart in age, only then would the buyer have to register as a tier one sex offender (10-years).
“I’m incredibly disappointed that not only did my colleagues reject my proposal to make the buying of children for sex a prison felony, but that I was blindsided when they amended my bill without my consent," said Senator Grove.
“Children of all ages deserve to be protected under the law and a simple fine after buying a child for sex is not an appropriate punishment. Californians across the state have made their voices heard and they want this law changed. Unfortunately, the members of the public safety committee continue their soft on crime approach at the expense of California’s most vulnerable, our children," concluded Senator Grove.
Senator Grove is actively discussing the next steps with her joint authors, coalition of survivors and advocates who are deeply invested in the outcome of this bill. She is committed to continuing the fight for all victims and survivors of sexual exploitation.
https://sr12.senate.ca.gov/con....tent/sen-groves-meas
https://abcnews.go.com/US/anti....-lgbtq-laws-prolifer
https://www.instagram.com/lexi....tmovement/reel/C9LM3
https://www.rvmnews.com/2024/0....7/lgbtq-activists-sp
https://www.woodtv.com/news/mi....chigan/activists-wei
In other news:
Kansas Supreme Court Strikes Down Abortion Regulations
https://www.theepochtimes.com/....us/kansas-supreme-co
VfB called this; the Amish are our pharmaceutical control group, as they do NOT permit the slow murder of their flock: AMISH COVID | FULL MEASURE 💉 ☠ 😷
https://old.bitchute.com/video/BHyafdynmXaf/
You're telling me this NEVER came up...not bloody once?!?
Source: https://matrix.org/_matrix/med....ia/r0/download/matri
Thumbnail: https://matrix.org/_matrix/media/r0/thumbnail/matrix.org/auwlorEHLaVDchFJkyXPyBnQ?width=700&height=700&method=scale
https://www.naturalnews.com/20....24-07-08-beware-thre
https://rumble.com/v1s0zm4-bri....cs-brics-bank-presid
https://timetofreeamerica.com/fight-for-freedom/
https://expose-news.com/2024/0....4/30/prions-caused-b
🚨 CIA Agent Testifies 'We Invented mRNA As a Bioweapon With Gates and WEF'
The CIA invented mRNA technology in conjunction with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Rockefeller Foundation, according to the bombshell testimony of CIA agent who admits that Covid vaccines were developed as a bioweapon to control humanity.
According to the agent and leaked top secret documents, the Covid plandemic was a psy-op run by the CIA to frogmarch humanity towards a total surveillance state, and Covid mRNA vaccines were not developed during Operation Warp Speed, but were ready and waiting for deployment for at least 10 years prior to the plandemic.
These revelations are all backed by fully verifiable documents and sources and will spell doom for the elite if we can spread this information to enough people.
H/t @RealAlexJones
https://x.com/tpvsean/status/1795732613765677073
BREAKING NEWS: House GOP Leaders Declare Biden 'Unfit' And Allege 'Cover-Up' Of His Mental State
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBgudA6Y6NQ
𝔼𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕣_𝕎𝕒𝕧𝕖 - Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) bluntly re-examines the highly questionable assertion by FBI officials that Satam al-Suqami's passport was discovered on the streets of New York before the Twin Towers collapsed on 9/11.
Source: https://x.com/5HTP_A8US3R/stat....us/18039309442035795
Thumbnail: https://foreignpolicy.com/2009..../10/30/daily-brief-p
VfB knows many of you thought you saw 'planes' in the skies; they were ancillary to the plot, which was to loot the gold under the WTC complex whilst hiding evidence of said theft and other crimes; of course, since VfB didn't commit 9/11, cannot possibly tell you all of the 'benefits' of said crime, but nearly 23 years later, can put a pretty comprehensive picture together 🖼
WE ALL WATCHED AN IMAX MOVIE IN MIDAIR 📽
Recall Gelitin | B-Thing?
What exactly did you think they were doing...?
Just to say it plainly: the passport was planted 🪪
This is the second half of the page 🖥
Modern Misconceptions and Clarifications
In modern political discourse, misunderstandings surrounding the terms 'republic' and 'democracy' are prevalent and are often strategically wielded in debates. These terminological misconceptions can distort public understanding and contribute to broader misrepresentations of the foundational principles governing the United States.
The conflation of 'democracy' and 'republic' in contemporary usage often obscures their distinct historical and constitutional meanings. A democracy, in its purest form as practiced in ancient Athens, involves direct participation of the citizenry in legislative decisions. While democratic, this approach was deemed impractical and potentially volatile by the framers of the U.S. Constitution, leading them to form a constitutional republic. This system combines representative democracy with foundational laws that protect individual rights and minority opinions against the potential tyranny of the majority.
During recent political upheavals, some commentators and politicians have asserted that calling the United States a democracy is incorrect, preferring instead the term 'republic'. This assertion, seen in media portrayals and political rhetoric, often suggests that appreciating the United States as a republic exclusively helps safeguard against the flaws of a pure democracy. Senator Mike Lee's comments from October 2020 exemplify this stance as he described the American system as not one of mere majorities but rather as a "constitutional republic" where majority rule is tempered by statutory and constitutional boundaries.3
This restrictive interpretation, however, misses a broader point: the terms are not mutually exclusive and are interwoven deeply in the fabric of the US governance system. The electorate's power to elect representatives who make and interpret laws is inherently democratic, while the constitutional framework that guides and limits governance embodies the republic notion. Ignoring this connection narrows the discourse and can polarize debates unnecessarily.
Some political figures selectively use these terms to energize bases or criticize opponents, framing the narrative to suggest incompatible differences between these government forms. This deepens political divides and shifts focus away from discussing the substantive functioning of our government. The debate over whether the founders intended a 'republic' over a 'democracy' sometimes serves specific agendas without enriching the understanding of how both elements are essential to the nation's structure.
Conversations around election integrity and the validity of electoral processes often draw on this 'republic vs. democracy' discourse. Allegations of election fraud and the undermining of voting processes are severe issues that require attention and resolution. However, using the definitions and interpretations of 'republic' and 'democracy' to frame such arguments risks muddying the objective understanding with political partisanship. It distracts from factual evidence and legal standards that are the true arbiters in such cases.
Resources committed to sharing knowledge and fostering understanding about the Constitution play a crucial role in clarifying these concepts. By providing accurate historical contexts and expert analyses, such platforms help demystify the rhetoric and encourage informed dialogue among the populace. Comprehending the complementary nature of democracy and republic in the constitutional framework of the United States enlightens citizens and helps maintain the principles of justice, liberty, and equality envisaged by the founding fathers and encapsulated in the document they crafted. This synergy between varying forms of governance underlines the adaptability and enduring longevity of the Constitution as a framework for our nation.
https://www.usconstitution.net..../republic-vs-democra
Source: https://matrix.org/_matrix/med....ia/r0/download/matri
Thumbnail: https://kilesuxs.blogspot.com/....2021/06/democracy-is
Both 9/11 & the Moon Landing are two of the greatest deceptions of all time. Once you realise the psychopaths ruling the World are prepared to enact & sustain such lies, you start questioning everything.
Source: https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/....status/1810024894127
Thumbnail: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/ne....ws/weird-news/791431
What are VfB's bona fides on these two events?
VfB called the events of September 11, 2001 at 10 AM that morning, as the first building disintegrated [Binyamin Netanyahu and Jerome Hauer gave up the game with their utterances 20 minutes prior];
At the age of four, VfB realized that the actual first man on the moon had to be Ed Palefsky, the cameraman
The Supreme Court in a 6-3 vote killed a legal precedent that conservatives have attacked for decades, known as the "Chevron deference".
"Today, the court places a tombstone on Chevron no one can miss," Justice Neil Gorsuch, one of the most conservative members wrote.
The deference, set in 1984 in a case involving the oil giant, gave federal agencies wide powers to interpret laws and decide the best ways to apply them.
In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court has slashed and severely weakened the powers of agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency.
The aftershocks of such a seismic decision will be felt throughout the federal government. Let's take a look at how we got here.
What was the Supreme Court case about?
While “Chevron deference” may sound like a chess strategy, it actually refers to a landmark Supreme Court ruling, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.
The court decided in 1984 that judges should defer to federal agencies in interpreting ambiguous parts of statutes.
The idea was that if Congress passes a law where something is unclear - or there is a “gap” - it is up to an agency to fill in the gap.
In practice, that gave arms of the federal government such as the Environmental Protection Agency the freedom to create and implement rules without fear of protracted legal battles.
Then, in 2020, herring fishermen entered the chat.
That year the Trump administration began requiring that they cover the costs of taking federal monitors on fishing trips. The fishing vessels did not have a choice - it was illegal to fish without federal monitors on board to check on the Atlantic fishery, an area that extends from Maine to North Carolina.
They previously didn't pay for the monitors.
Commercial fishing companies - supported by conservative and corporate groups including the billionaire Charles Koch - sued in two separate cases.
In one, a federal judge ruled the National Marine Fisheries Service could legally impose the costs under the Chevron deference.
Who wins in throwing it out?
This is a big win for conservatives
For four decades, they have been working to overturn the precedent.
By giving executive agencies more freedom to implement laws, in the conservative view, it vastly expanded the power of the federal bureaucracy.
In areas like workplace safety, financial markets and the environment, courts – and, by extension, businesses contemplating legal challenges to regulations - had to yield to agencies' interpretations of laws.
The Supreme Court has been paring back agency power in recent years, saying there are “major questions” of policy that Congress must explicitly detail in order for agencies to take action on them.
“Chevron deference” as a legal principle, however, had endured, setting guidelines for lower courts to follow.
On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered the final blow.
Who loses?
This is a defeat for the Biden administration, which argued that throwing out the Chevron deference would be destabilising.
Liberal Justice Elena Kagan said that the ruling elevates the Supreme Court’s power over other branches of US government. The president, congress and court are supposed to have equal power under the US constitution, so by her reading the ruling is a loss for the White House, the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Advocacy groups and progressives also saw it as a setback for clean water, public health, fair lending, worker safety, and other areas where people rely on federal help.
The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organisation, for example, called the ruling "a monumental setback that will harm all Americans and profoundly impact our nation's environmental safeguards and public health protections".
"The court has set us on a path towards policy paralysis," it said.
The ruling does not apply to past agency regulations and actions.
Looking to the future, corporations and others wanting to challenge agency rules will be heading to court and we can expect to see judges around the country now weighing in on what the federal government - and its bureaucracy - does.
Rules, requirements and penalties could all be stopped before they are implemented or overturned.
In the long-term, expect Congress to try to write more explicit instructions in its laws that lay out exactly how agencies will implement them. That could lead to confusion in large agencies carrying out different programmes - if Congress can actually pass those laws.
“The problem is many people think the congress is quite dysfunctional now,” Philip Bobbitt, an expert on constitutional law at Columbia Law School, told the BBC.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51ywwrq45qo
Source: https://matrix.org/_matrix/med....ia/r0/download/matri
Thumbnail: https://www.wsj.com/articles/c....hevron-deference-was
EPSTEIN FILES COME AT A BAD TIME FOR THE ELITE
https://old.bitchute.com/video
One of the things VfB used to do on RUMBLE was to time capsule data; AltCastTV now serves said function:
steverino76 @steverino76 [posting from GAB]
·Destroying the Illusion Group·1 repost·34m
@CANST When you understand Chevron deference, you understand that Loper Bright was a criminal usurpation by the courts. I don't want unelected and unaccountable judges rewriting my Constitution for oligarch bribes.
The Constitution is NOT what the judges say it is;
it is what THE CONSTITUTION says it is.
I'm an originalist. I'm a purist that way.
Whereas courts are invested with “the judicial Power,” Congress enjoys considerable authority to dictate when and how that power is exercised. Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506, 513 (1868) (jurisdiction is conferred "with such exceptions and under such regulations as Congress shall make").
So-called “Chevron deference” was grounded in the concept of agency; where Congress had expressed its intent in a statute, its interpretation was dispositive, but where “Congress has explicitly left a gap for the agency to fill, there is an express delegation of authority to the agency to elucidate a specific provision of the statute by regulation.” Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984).
On information and belief, Chevron deference was predicated on the rational assumption that Congress knew enough to know what they didn’t know and chose to defer technical questions to people with technical expertise.
By definition, the “alphabet agencies” are authorized agents of Congress, subject to its control and even abolition.
“Congress may certainly delegate to others, powers which the legislature may right-fully exercise itself.” Wayman v. Southard, 23 U.S. 1, 43 (1825) (e.g., the Judiciary Act of 1789, 1 Stat. 73, c. 20 (Sept. 24, 1789)).
Pursuant to that authority, public agencies have been “filling in the details,” United States v. Grimaud, 220 U.S. 506, 517 (1911), in vague and incomplete laws for at least a century.
The business of writing the detailed laws necessary for a government as large as ours is too enormous for any legislative body to accomplish (and in particular, when ConMen half of their time “dialing for dollars,” and the rest of it reading “Green Eggs and Ham” into the public record. Congressional Fundraising, Last Week To-night with John Oliver, HBO (2016), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ylomy1Aw9Hk).
In 1946, Congress enacted the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 500, et seq., (“the APA”), touted by its Senate sponsor as “a bill of rights for the hundreds of thou-sands of Americans whose affairs are controlled or regulated in one way or another by agencies of the Federal Government.” Administrative Procedure Act S. Proceedings, 79th Cong. 298 (1946) (stmt. of Sen. McCarran (D-NV)).
The APA was intended to standardize the lawmaking process, affording stakeholders a voice in the process.
“Legislative rules are required when Congress simply provided an end result, without any guidance as to how to achieve the desired result or when a statutory provision does not provide adequate authority for the regulatory action taken.” Internal Revenue Manual, Part 32 (Published Guidance and Other Guidance to Taxpayers). Ch. 1, § 1.2.7 , Internal Revenue Service, Nov. 19, 2019, at https://www.irs.gov/irm/part32/irm_32-001-001.
All legislative rules, including rules of civil and criminal procedure applicable in all federal courts, 28 U.S.C. § 2071, are subject to Congressional approval. 5 U.S.C. § 801, et seq.
“[I]nterpretative rules, general statements of policy, [and] rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice” are exempt from the rule-making requirements of the APA. 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(4)(A).
In making all agency rules interpretive, the "Justices" have effectively repealed the entire APA. Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. Raimondo, No. 22-451 (2024).
In making all agency rules interpretive, the "Justices" have unlawfully intruded on Congress’ lawmaking power.
On information and belief, Chevron deference was predicated on the rational assumption that Congress knew enough to know what they didn’t know, and had lawful authority to delegate lawmaking in technical areas to people with technical expertise.
If Congress disapproved of Chevron deference, it had forty years to pass a law modifying or even interring the practice.
Through their failure to act, Congress has expressed the opinion that they would rather have non-partisan technocrats than bribe-taking judges without expertise or G.E.D.-trained bartenders making day-to-day decisions in their name.
While it is true that courts “special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities,” Loper Bright, slip op. at 23, that conceit presupposes the existence of an actual court of law, capable of construing the law with “[c]lear heads . . . and honest hearts,” 1 Works of James Wilson 363 (J. Andrews ed. 1896), which, on information and belief, the Roberts TRUMP “Court”—which openly defies a statutes intended to restrain it, 28 U.S.C. § 455, and has no code of ethics or ethics to speak of—no longer even pretends to approximate.
WHY CAN'T YOU GOYIMZES JUST EAT THE DAMN BUGS AND BE HAPPY?!? 🪲😋
https://www.zerohedge.com/geop....olitical/watch-klaus
Source: https://matrix.org/_matrix/med....ia/r0/download/matri
Thumbnail: https://www.isdglobal.org/digi....tal_dispatches/the-s
Jean-Claude: WAR CORRESPONDENT: REMOTE VIEWING WITH DICK ALLGIRE JULY 4 SPECIAL UPDATE...
https://rumble.com/v55hkcu-war....-correspondent-remot
WTPN SITUATION UPDATE 7/5/24 BLACKOUT IMMINENT, PRISON BARGES @Gitmo, BIDEN EXPOSED...
https://rumble.com/v55rfg9-wtp....n-situation-update-7
Michael Salla: Galactic History According to Lion and Bird People Races: Interview with Jelaila Starr...
https://rumble.com/v55bqmm-gal....actic-history-accord
ABANDONED $28,000,000 Los Angeles Mansion Owned By BIN LADEN Family
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7g4y6UYjlA
Pandemics, Financial Collapse, War & Terrorism Designed to Overwhelm – Steve Quayle
https://rumble.com/v55rl0x-pan....demics-financial-col
150 Million Americans Under Weather Alerts As "Potentially Historic Heatwave" Tests Major Power Grids
https://www.zerohedge.com/weat....her/150-million-amer
Anons calling out DEMONrat scumbaggery: 🐀
RiverMirrorPicnic
House Democrats are “Bringing Out the Big Guns” to Allow Illegal Aliens to Vote in 2024 Presidential Election
BeyondAppleLion
them faggits will be firing blanks
4 fishermen just took down the 4th branch of government and restored the Constitution.
The Lober case. Watch 📺
https://www.nytimes.com/intera....ctive/2024/06/28/us/
https://static01.nyt.com/newsg....raphics/documenttool
Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/09hqnJdsx7hT
Thumbnail: https://www.scotusblog.com/202....4/06/supreme-court-s
AltCastTV & Odysee thumbnail: https://www.thirdway.org/memo/....what-a-trump-win-wou
This article was updated on June 28 at 3:46 p.m.
In a major ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday cut back sharply on the power of federal agencies to interpret the laws they administer and ruled that courts should rely on their own interpretion of ambiguous laws. The decision will likely have far-reaching effects across the country, from environmental regulation to healthcare costs.
By a vote of 6-3, the justices overruled their landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of the statute as long as it was reasonable. But in a 35-page ruling by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices rejected that doctrine, calling it “fundamentally misguided.”
Justice Elena Kagan dissented, in an opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Kagan predicted that Friday’s ruling “will cause a massive shock to the legal system.”
When the Supreme Court first issued its decision in the Chevron case more than 40 years ago, the decision was not necessarily regarded as a particularly consequential one. But in the years since then, it became one of the most important rulings on federal administrative law, cited by federal courts more than 18,000 times.
Although the Chevron decision – which upheld the Reagan-era Environmental Protection Agency’s interpretation of the Clean Air Act that eased regulation of emissions – was generally hailed by conservatives at the time, the ruling eventually became a target for those seeking to curtail the administrative state, who argued that courts, rather than federal agencies, should say what the law means. The justices had rebuffed earlier requests (including by one of the same lawyers who argued one of the cases here) to consider overruling Chevron before they agreed last year to take up a pair of challenges to a rule issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The agency had required the herring industry to pay for the costs, estimated at $710 per day, associated with carrying observers on board their vessels to collect data about their catches and monitor for overfishing.
The agency stopped the monitoring in 2023 because of a lack of funding. While the program was in effect, the agency reimbursed fishermen for the costs of the observers.
After two federal courts of appeals rebuffed challenges to the rules, two sets of commercial fishing companies came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to weigh in.
The justices took up their appeals, agreeing to address only the Chevron question in Relentless v. Department of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. (Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented in the Relentless case but was recused from the Loper-Bright case, presumably because she had heard oral argument in the case while she was still a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.)
Chevron deference, Roberts explained in his opinion for the court on Friday, is inconsistent with the Administrative Procedure Act, a federal law that sets out the procedures that federal agencies must follow as well as instructions for courts to review actions by those agencies. The APA, Roberts noted, directs courts to “decide legal questions by applying their own judgment” and therefore “makes clear that agency interpretations of statutes — like agency interpretations of the Constitution — are not entitled to deference. Under the APA,” Roberts concluded, “it thus remains the responsibility of the court to decide whether the law means what the agency says.”
Read the rest at the thumbnail URL
The suspect died at the hospital after a police chase.
For more Local News from WXIX: https://www.fox19.com/
For more YouTube Content: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCiOEUz7UCTSo6NUcQ
#kentucky #local #localnews #massshooting #massshootings #police #cops #investigations #investigation #cincinnati #news #crime #crimescene #home #house #party
source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiZZyoNOJIs
FLORENCE, Ky. (WXIX) - The four people and the suspect in the deadly early Saturday mass shooting have been identified.
An emotional Florence Police Chief Jeff Mallery released their names during a 1 p.m. press conference. He said the department had never dealt with anything of this magnitude and that they were still trying to process what happened overnight on Ridgecrest Drive.
The victims:
Delaney Eary, 19 years old
Hayden Rybicki, 20 years old
Melissa Parrett, 44 years old
Shane Miller, 20 years old
The suspect, who later died at St. Elizabeth from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, is 21-year-old Chase Garvey, Chief Mallery announced.
The shooting happened during a birthday for Parrett’s 21-year-old child at her home on Ridgecrest Drive in Florence, according to the chief.
Garvey was not invited to the party, but did know those celebrating, Chief Mallery explained.
The 21-year-old shot seven people, four of whom died at the scene. The three surviving victims are expected to be okay.
Shortly before 3 a.m., officers arrived at the home after receiving multiple calls about an “active shooter,” the chief said Saturday.
“When officers arrived, they could still hear gunshots,” Chief Mallory said. “They approached the residence and saw multiple victims. Partygoers told the police that the suspect had fled.”
Police say Garvey fled the scene, leading officers on a chase. Because Garvey was known to those at the birthday party, the chief said officers were given a description of his vehicle.
Those officers saw multiple victims, including two in the front yard, he said.
”We train on this, hoping it would never happen, but unfortunately, we’ve been touched like so many departments and cities,” Chief Mallery said of the officers who went to the Ridgecrest Drive home.
By that point, Garvey had left the mass shooting scene, according to the police chief.
Officers “quickly” found his vehicle near Farmview Drive and US-42, according to an earlier press release from police.
Garvey did not stop, prompting a Florence officer and Boone County Sheriff’s Office deputy to pursue.
“A Boone County deputy attempted to stop the vehicle,” Chief Mallory continued. “A pursuit ensued, traveling south on I-42 into Union, the suspect shot himself and crashed his vehicle.”
His car crashed into a ditch on Dale Heimbrock Way near Hicks Pike, police explained.
Garvey was taken to St. Elizabeth Hospital, where he died, according to police.
In the press conference Saturday, Chief Mallery stated that Garvey was a convicted felon with a history of sex crimes.
“This is the first mass shooting in Florence, so it’s understandably emotional for everyone involved,” Mallery said.
His motive remains unknown as police continue their murder investigation.
Call Florence police at 859-371-1234 if you have any information.
https://www.fox19.com/2024/07/06/4-victims-killed-suspect-identified-nky-mass-shooting/
Receive up to $10,000 in free silver: https://colonialmetalsgroup.com/tpv or call 888-351-2043
- Save 15% off Liver Medic's Leaky Gut Repair using code 'peoplesvoice' - visit: https://livermedic.com/step/leakygutspecial/
- Visit https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/IPV6 to take back control of the Internet
Barack Obama is busy behind the scenes laying the groundwork to thrust his wife Michelle Obama into the presidential race in place of the ailing and failing Joe Biden, according to multiple Democrat party insiders.
Things are so dire in the Biden camp that even the mainstream media has been forced to intervene and campaign for Biden to step down for the former first lady.
But there is just one problem for Barack Obama and his plans to steal yet another term in office by controlling another puppet president in the White House.
The Obamas have more skeletons in their closet than Ed Gein and now scientists are confirming that Michelle Obama was born male.
The truth is not the Obamas’ friend and its our job to expose this to the masses.